The Fifth Massachusetts
1777–1781
Question 1
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
explain away every right belonging to the States and to make their own power as unlimited as they please. all sovereign power was in the States separately
— Thomas Burke, Burke explains his reservation of state sovereignty (April 29, 1777)
Which feature of the Articles of Confederation most directly addressed the danger described in the letter?
- Congress could lay taxes directly on people living inside the states.
- Powers not expressly given to Congress stayed with the states.
- Seats in Congress increased as a state's population grew.
- Each state cast one vote in Congress, whatever the size of its population.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Powers not expressly given to Congress stayed with the states.
- A power to tax individuals would have enlarged the central authority leaders feared after Parliament's taxes; the Articles left collection to the states.
- Article II reserved to the states any power the Articles did not expressly give Congress, blocking a broad reading that could swallow state authority.
- The Articles gave each state one vote, and population-based seats were the fight large states brought to the 1787 Convention.
- Equal state votes were a real feature of the Articles, but they settled a quarrel over representation, separate from the fear of an open-ended grant of power.
Skill: Explain how a source supports an argument
Question 2
Read the source
Printed census return and explicit arithmetic · Verbatim
Truly stated from the original Returns deposited in the Office of the Secretary of State.
— United States census returns, attested by Thomas Jefferson, 1790 population compared with the Articles voting rule (1790 census · later comparison)
Article V: "each State shall have one vote."
Later comparison, 1790 census: Virginia including Kentucky, 821,287 people; Delaware, 59,096. Virginia's total combines its two district returns; Delaware's total is the sum of its printed components.
— Articles of Confederation, V; 1790 returns attested October 24, 1791. Population includes free and enslaved people, not just voters.
The disparity shown most directly contributed to which later development?
- The 1787 ban on slavery in the territory north of the Ohio River
- Armed crowds closing county courts in western Massachusetts
- A large-state fight in 1787 to replace equal votes in Congress
- Property tests for voting written into the new state constitutions
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) A large-state fight in 1787 to replace equal votes in Congress
- The Northwest Ordinance's slavery ban came from sectional votes on western territory, not from the rule of one vote per state.
- Farmers in western Massachusetts closed courts in 1786 over taxes and debt, a state crisis separate from congressional seats.
- Equal votes let small states match large ones, and at the Constitutional Convention the large states fought to tie representation to population.
- State constitutions already required property to vote in the 1770s, years before this population gap became a national argument.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 3
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
That silver and gold be receivable in payment of the said quotas, at the rate of one Spanish milled dollar in lieu of 40 dollars of the bills now in circulation.
— Continental Congress, Congress calls in Continental bills at forty to one (March 18, 1780)
The resolution most directly reflects which problem of the national government in this period?
- Congress paid for the war with paper and promises, having no tax of its own.
- A national bank had issued more notes than its gold reserves could cover.
- The states had given up the power to tax and handed it to Congress.
- A British naval blockade had cut Spanish silver coin off from American ports.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Congress paid for the war with paper and promises, having no tax of its own.
- With no power to tax, Congress printed Continentals and paid soldiers in promises, and by 1780 it took forty paper dollars to match one silver dollar.
- The Bank of the United States was chartered in 1791, under the Constitution, and did not issue the wartime Continentals.
- The Articles left taxation with the state legislatures, which is why Congress had to ask them for money.
- Wartime trade was disrupted, but the collapse came from printing far more paper than Congress could redeem.
Skill: Explain a cause of a historical development
Go, Starve, and Be Forgotten
1781–1783
Question 4
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
of four Millions payable according to the requisitions of Congress by the first Instant, I did not receive forty thousand dollars.
— Robert Morris, Four million due; less than forty thousand received (July 29, 1782)
Which feature of the Articles of Confederation most directly explains the revenue shortfall described in the letter?
- Congress depended on state legislatures to collect the money it requested.
- Congress was forbidden to borrow money from any source.
- Each state owed Congress exactly the same dollar amount.
- Congress had no authority to borrow money from France or other governments.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Congress depended on state legislatures to collect the money it requested.
- Under the Articles, Congress could only requisition the states, and the legislatures decided what to collect, so a request for millions could bring in almost nothing.
- Congress borrowed at home and from France and Dutch bankers during the war; the shortfall was unpaid requisitions.
- Requisitions were apportioned among the states, and equal votes in Congress did not mean equal dollar quotas.
- Foreign loans were one of the few ways Congress raised money; what it lacked was a tax of its own.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 5
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
five years' full pay in money, or securities on interest at six per cent. per annum
— United States in Congress assembled, Five years' pay replaces officers' half-pay for life (March 22, 1783)
The resolution best illustrates which weakness critics later cited when urging revision of the Articles?
- Congress had no legal power to raise troops or to pay the officers.
- Continental officers were state employees Congress could not legally pay.
- Congress could promise pay but had no tax of its own to fund it.
- Spending bills needed the separate approval of all thirteen state legislatures.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Congress could promise pay but had no tax of its own to fund it.
- Congress had raised and directed the Continental Army through the war; the problem was paying it, not a missing power to have an army.
- These were Continental officers, owed pay by the United States, not employees of a single state.
- In March 1783 Congress turned the officers' half-pay for life into five years' pay in cash or interest-bearing securities, but with no independent tax it could not be sure of honoring them.
- Amending the Articles took all thirteen states; ordinary money measures needed nine states in Congress, not a separate yes from each legislature.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 6
Read the source
Petition · Verbatim
I beg leave to put the petition into your Excellency’s hands.
— Rufus Putnam; 288 Continental officers, Putnam forwards the officers' western land petition (June 16, 1783)
That provision may also be made for a farther grant of lands, to such of the army as wish to become adventurers in the new government, in such quantities and on such conditions of settlement and purchases, for public securities, as Congress shall judge most for the interest of the intended government
— Petition of Continental officers, forwarded by Rufus Putnam, June 16, 1783
The officers' proposal most directly anticipated which development under the Confederation?
- Replacing state legislatures with permanent military governors
- Using western land to give value to holders of public debt claims
- Requiring Britain to fund pensions for Continental veterans
- Distributing confiscated Loyalist estates to veterans of the Continental Army
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Using western land to give value to holders of public debt claims
- The petition asked Congress for land north of the Ohio and did not propose military rule over the existing states.
- Officers asked to buy western land with public securities, and the Land Ordinance of 1785 later accepted United States debt certificates as payment for that land.
- The proposal was addressed to Congress and concerned American land, not a British pension.
- Some states confiscated Loyalist property, but this proposal concerned the national domain west of the Ohio, not those estates.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Seven States
1783–1786
Question 7
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
No more than seven States are yet assembled
— United States in Congress assembled, Seven states wait for the treaty quorum (January 5, 1784)
No more than seven States are yet assembled; these are unanimously desirous to ratify the Treaty.
— Congress to its ministers, January 5, 1784
The situation described most directly illustrates which criticism of the Articles of Confederation?
- A national president could block a treaty he opposed.
- National courts could strike down a treaty Congress had approved.
- Large states could outvote small states on treaties and foreign policy.
- Requiring nine states slowed ordinary acts such as ratifying a treaty.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Requiring nine states slowed ordinary acts such as ratifying a treaty.
- The Articles created no separate executive with a veto; the presiding officer of Congress could not hold up a treaty.
- There was no system of national courts that could overturn a treaty.
- Each state had one vote, so a large state could not outvote a small one on foreign policy.
- Treaties needed nine states, and in the winter of 1783–84 only seven delegations were present, so the Treaty of Paris waited until January 1784.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 8
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
Jersey would have been for it, but there were but two members, one of whom was sick in his chambers.
— Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson explains New Jersey's missing state vote (April 25, 1784)
1784: the proposed ban on slavery in the western territories "was lost by an individual vote only." Six states voted aye; seven affirmative states were required.
1787: "There shall be neither Slavery nor involuntary Servitude in the said territory otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted"
— Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, April 25, 1784; Northwest Ordinance, Article VI, July 13, 1787
Taken together, the two votes are best used as evidence of which continuing issue in U.S. politics?
- The Federalist quarrel with Anti-Federalists over a bill of rights
- Sectional conflict over letting slavery expand into western land
- Whether Congress had power to charter a national bank
- How far to restore property taken from Loyalists during the war
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Sectional conflict over letting slavery expand into western land
- Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued over the Constitution and a bill of rights in 1787–88; these votes were about slavery in the West.
- A ban on slavery in the western territories failed by one state in 1784, and in 1787 Congress banned it north of the Ohio, so the sectional fight over expansion was already underway.
- The bank fight came in 1791, under the Constitution, and these votes did not concern a charter.
- The Treaty of Paris asked Congress to recommend Loyalist restitution, a dispute separate from the western slavery votes.
Skill: Explain continuity and change
Question 9
Read the source
Treaty · Verbatim
creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.
— British and American peace commissioners, The Treaty of Paris creates obligations on both sides (September 3, 1783)
creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.
his Brittanic Majesty shall with all convenient speed, and without causing any destruction, or carrying away any Negroes or other property of the American inhabitants, withdraw all his armies, garrisons, and fleets from the said United States
— Treaty of Paris, Articles IV and VII, September 3, 1783
Britain kept western posts while citing American barriers to debt collection. Which account best explains both the treaty and that dispute?
- Congress could sign treaties but could not make the states or Britain obey them.
- The Articles left Congress with no power to negotiate or ratify a foreign treaty.
- The peace treaty granted Britain a lasting right to the Great Lakes forts.
- Britain still refused, in the treaty, to recognize American independence.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Congress could sign treaties but could not make the states or Britain obey them.
- Congress ratified the Treaty of Paris, but it could not compel states to let British creditors collect, and Britain cited that failure while keeping forts such as Niagara and Detroit.
- Congress negotiated the peace and, once nine states were present, ratified it in January 1784.
- Article VII required British troops to leave; holding the forts broke that term and was not a right the treaty granted.
- Britain recognized American independence in the Treaty of Paris; the quarrel was over carrying out the other articles.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Section Sixteen
1785–1786
Question 10
Read the source
Land Ordinance · Verbatim
There shall be reserved the lot N 16, of every township, for the maintenance of public schools, within the said township.
— United States in Congress assembled, Survey, sale, and the school lot (May 20, 1785)
The provision belongs to which success of the national government under the Articles of Confederation?
- Compelling Britain to give up its forts on the Great Lakes
- Stopping the long slide in the value of paper money
- Bringing boundary quarrels between neighboring states to a settlement
- Surveying, selling, and governing the national lands in the West
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Surveying, selling, and governing the national lands in the West
- Britain kept posts such as Niagara and Detroit after 1783, and the Confederation never forced those garrisons out.
- Continental bills had already collapsed by 1780, and Congress still had no tax that could restore their value.
- States quarreled over borders under a clumsy process that settled few of them; this clause sets aside a school lot, not a state line.
- Under the Articles, Congress surveyed the land north of the Ohio, sold it, reserved a lot in each township for schools, and in 1787 gave that territory a government and a path to statehood.
Skill: Explain a historical development
Question 11
Read the source
Translated testimony preserved in a commissioner's journal · Verbatim
English translation by Richard Butler (1848 edition)
God gave us this country, we do not understand measuring out the lands, it is all ours
— Kekewepellethe, recorded in English by Richard Butler, Kekewepellethe answers the commissioners (January 30, 1786)
The speaker's position most directly challenged which assumption behind the Land Ordinance of 1785?
- The states should hold on to their separate claims to land in the West.
- Western land should be sold for gold and silver coin alone.
- Congress could survey and sell the Ohio country as United States land.
- Congress should hold back a lot in each township for schools.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Congress could survey and sell the Ohio country as United States land.
- By 1785 the landed states had ceded their western claims to Congress, so the ordinance assumed a national domain.
- The ordinance accepted specie or federal debt certificates, and this speech rejects the survey itself.
- The Land Ordinance treated land north of the Ohio as public land to be measured and sold, and Shawnee leaders at Fort Finney answered that the country was already theirs.
- The school reservation was part of the ordinance, but this speech attacks the right to divide the land.
Skill: Explain how point of view shapes a source
Question 12
Read the source
Land Ordinance · Verbatim
There shall be reserved the lot N 16, of every township, for the maintenance of public schools, within the said township.
— United States in Congress assembled, Survey, sale, and the school lot (May 20, 1785)
The plats of the townships respectively, shall be marked by subdivisions into lots of one mile square, or 640 acres, in the same direction as the external lines, and numbered from 1 to 36; always beginning the succeeding range of the lots with the number next to that with which the preceding one concluded.
none of the lands, within the said territory, be sold under the price of one dollar the acre, to be paid in specie, or loan office certificates, reduced to specie value, by the scale of depreciation, or certificates of liquidated debts of the United States
— Land Ordinance, May 20, 1785
These terms of sale most directly help explain which development of the 1780s?
- Small farmers bought up most of the first townships offered at auction.
- Land companies and speculators made the early purchases north of the Ohio.
- Congress turned away debt certificates as payment for western land.
- Settlers there at once voted on whether each new territory would permit slavery.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Land companies and speculators made the early purchases north of the Ohio.
- A square mile at a dollar an acre, plus survey charges, was more cash than most farm families could pay up front.
- The smallest purchase was 640 acres at no less than a dollar an acre, so companies and speculators, including veterans pooling certificates, bought first.
- The ordinance took specie or United States debt certificates, and Congress later accepted the Ohio Company's certificates as payment.
- Congress itself banned slavery north of the Ohio in 1787; settlers did not vote on it at the 1785 sales, and popular sovereignty of that kind came in the 1850s.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Hard Money
1786 · with retrospective testimony
Question 13
Read the source
Retrospective compensation appeal to Henry Knox · Verbatim
to repay a part of the Money I borrowed before I received any from the Commonwealth
— William Shepard, Shepard explains why he sold his certificate (Undated, circa 1790)
I was obliged to dispose of a final Settlement Certificate of Eleven hundred and thirteen Dollars, at less [than] four Shillings on the pound
— William Shepard to Henry Knox, undated, circa 1790
The account best illustrates which economic problem of the 1780s?
- Pay certificates lost value because Congress lacked money to redeem them.
- Notes issued by a national bank drove gold and silver coin out of circulation.
- A federal tax on whiskey forced veterans to sell off their property.
- Congress canceled the pay certificates it had issued during the war.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Pay certificates lost value because Congress lacked money to redeem them.
- Congress paid soldiers with certificates it could not redeem, and veterans sold them for a fraction of face value to buyers betting a future government would pay in full.
- The Bank of the United States dates from 1791; these certificates were wartime and Confederation debt, not bank notes.
- The federal whiskey excise was a tax of the 1790s; this sale was of a Revolutionary pay certificate.
- Congress did not cancel the certificates; it still owed them, which is why they kept a market price at all.
Skill: Explain a cause of a historical development
Question 14
Read the source
Town petition to the General Court · Verbatim
No money to be had: our Estates dayly polled and sold
— Petitioners of Greenwich, Massachusetts, Greenwich describes distress sales and asks for relief (January 16, 1786)
our Land after itt is prised by the best Judges under oath is sold for about one third of the Value of itt our cattle about one half theValue
— Greenwich petition to the Massachusetts General Court, January 16, 1786
The petition most directly helps explain why crowds later stopped county courts from sitting, because the petitioners believed that
- Congress had stripped the state courts of authority over private debts.
- Shutting a courthouse would wipe out the debts they owed.
- Scarce coin and forced sales were costing them land and livestock.
- The state had begun issuing large amounts of paper money.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Scarce coin and forced sales were costing them land and livestock.
- Debt cases stayed in the state courts; the Articles did not move them to Congress.
- Stopping a court could delay a suit, but it did not erase the debt.
- With little gold or silver in the hill towns, court-ordered sales brought a fraction of the appraised price, and crowds later blocked the courts to stop those sales.
- Massachusetts refused the towns' request for paper money; printing it was what the protesters asked for, not what the state had done.
Skill: Explain a cause of a historical development
Question 15
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
they are determined to annihilate all debts public and private
— Henry Knox, Knox alleges a campaign to abolish debts (October 23, 1786)
they are determined to annihilate all debts public and private.
to discharge both our foreign and domestick debt.
— Henry Knox to George Washington, October 23, 1786; Daniel Gray's address, December 1786
Which best explains why the two descriptions of the protesters differ?
- Knox opposed strengthening Congress and hoped to discredit the men who defended it.
- Gray addressed his appeal to British officials and asked them for troops.
- Knox's letter predates the closing of the Massachusetts courts.
- Knox wrote to warn a national leader; Gray wrote to defend the protesters.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Knox wrote to warn a national leader; Gray wrote to defend the protesters.
- Knox was Secretary at War and a leading nationalist, pressing for a stronger government.
- Gray's address was a public defense for Massachusetts readers, printed in the American press.
- Crowds stopped the Northampton court on August 29, 1786, and Knox wrote to Washington on October 23, after those closings.
- Knox, alarmed about property and order, described the protesters as men out to abolish debts, while Gray, speaking for the armed body, asked for a way to pay the public debt.
Skill: Explain how situation shapes a source
The Unhappy Time
1787 · and 1794
Question 16
Read the source
Town petition to the General Court · Verbatim
No money to be had: our Estates dayly polled and sold
— Petitioners of Greenwich, Massachusetts, Greenwich describes distress sales and asks for relief (January 16, 1786)
our Land after itt is prised by the best Judges under oath is sold for about one third of the Value of itt our cattle about one half theValue
No money to be had: our Estates dayly polled and sold
— Greenwich petition to the Massachusetts General Court, January 16, 1786
The grievances described were most similar to those behind which later event?
- The Hartford Convention, called by New England Federalists
- The Whiskey Rebellion of farmers in western Pennsylvania
- The Stono Rebellion of enslaved people in South Carolina
- The Boston Tea Party, a protest against a British tax
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) The Whiskey Rebellion of farmers in western Pennsylvania
- The Hartford Convention of 1814 was a meeting of New England Federalists angry about the War of 1812, not a backcountry protest against an eastern tax.
- Like the Massachusetts Regulators, western Pennsylvania farmers in 1794 resisted a tax from a distant government they believed favored other regions.
- The Stono Rebellion in 1739 was an uprising of enslaved people in South Carolina, not a taxpayers' protest.
- The Tea Party in 1773 attacked a tax from Parliament; these petitions attacked a state legislature's taxes and debt courts after independence.
Skill: Explain a similarity between developments
Question 17
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
voluntarily offered a loan to support the publick cause.
— George Richards Minot; Congress, A private loan raises a public army (January 1787)
The private loan used to field a state army against the uprising most directly illustrates which problem of the Confederation period?
- Massachusetts had given Congress its power to raise militia.
- The Articles forbade Congress to raise troops once the war had ended.
- Congress could authorize troops but not reliably pay for them.
- Massachusetts refused to send militia against people of its own state.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Congress could authorize troops but not reliably pay for them.
- Massachusetts raised its own army under its governor and had not handed the militia power to Congress.
- In October 1786 Congress voted to add to the troops already in service; the Articles did not forbid a peacetime force.
- Congress voted to raise men, but the states sent too little money and few enlisted, so Boston merchants lent the funds and Massachusetts fielded its own army.
- Massachusetts did use force: state militia held the Springfield arsenal, and a state army pursued the Regulators to Petersham.
Skill: Explain a cause of a historical development
Question 18
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
The unhappy time is come in which we have been obliged to shed blood.
— William Shepard, The unhappy time: Shepard reports the firing (January 26, 1787)
The unhappy time is come in which we have been obliged to shed blood. Shays, who was at the head of about twelve hundred men, marched yesterday afternoon about four o'Clock, towards the public buildings in battle array.
— William Shepard to Governor James Bowdoin, January 26, 1787
Nationalists in 1787 most likely cited events like the one described as evidence that
- the Confederation could not keep order, and a stronger government was needed.
- the farmers of Massachusetts wanted to bring back British rule.
- the Articles gave Congress dangerous command of the state militias.
- western settlers were rising against the new ban on slavery north of the Ohio River.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) the Confederation could not keep order, and a stronger government was needed.
- Congress could not pay for troops to defend its arsenal at Springfield, and leaders such as Washington treated the uprising as proof the Articles had to be strengthened.
- The Regulators aimed at debt courts and state taxes in Massachusetts; they did not fight to restore the king.
- The weakness ran the other way: Congress could not compel the states, and Massachusetts, not Congress, raised the army that ended the uprising.
- The Northwest Ordinance, including its slavery ban, passed in July 1787, months after this January fight, and the crowd at Springfield was not protesting that law.
Skill: Explain a cause of a historical development
Final Review
1777–1788
Question 19
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
So soon as there shall be five thousand free male inhabitants of full age in the district
— United States in Congress assembled, The territorial ladder to equal statehood (July 13, 1787)
So soon as there shall be five thousand free male inhabitants of full age in the district, upon giving proof thereof to the governor, they shall receive authority, with time and place, to elect representatives from their counties or townships to represent them in the general assembly, provided that for every five hundred free male inhabitants there shall be one representative.
whenever any of the said States shall have sixty thousand free Inhabitants therein, such State shall be admitted by its Delegates into the Congress of the United States
— Northwest Ordinance, July 13, 1787
The process outlined was most significant because it
- ended the fighting with Native nations in the Ohio Valley.
- allowed settlers to vote on slavery inside the territory.
- became the pattern by which most later territories entered as states.
- made admission wait until a territory had paid off the national debt in full.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) became the pattern by which most later territories entered as states.
- Conflict with Native nations in the Ohio country continued after 1787 and was not settled until the American victory of 1794.
- Settlers did not vote on slavery there; Congress banned it, and letting territories vote on slavery was a policy of the 1850s.
- Appointed government, then an elected assembly, then admission became the path Ohio and most later territories followed into the Union.
- The ordinance tied admission to population, not to paying down the national debt.
Skill: Explain a historical development
Question 20
Read the source
Federal law · Verbatim
Article the Sixth. There shall be neither Slavery nor involuntary Servitude in the said territory otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted; provided always that any person escaping into the same, from whom labor or service is lawfully claimed in any one of the original States, such fugitive may be lawfully reclaimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service as aforesaid.
— United States in Congress assembled, Article VI: prohibition and reclamation (July 13, 1787)
Article VI is best understood as evidence that, in the 1780s, national leaders
- had brought slavery to an end in the original thirteen states.
- claimed a power to regulate slavery inside the existing states.
- meant that escape north across the Ohio would make an enslaved person free.
- limited slavery's growth in the Northwest but still returned fugitives.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) limited slavery's growth in the Northwest but still returned fugitives.
- The ban applied to the Northwest Territory; slavery continued in the original states, especially in the South.
- The Articles did not give Congress power over slavery inside the existing states; this article governed the national territory.
- The same article allowed a person who escaped into the territory to be reclaimed, so crossing the Ohio did not free them.
- Congress banned slavery north of the Ohio and, in the same article, let enslavers reclaim people who had escaped from the original states.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 21
Read the source
Private letter to James Madison · Verbatim
Thirteen Sovereignties pulling against each other, and all tugging at the fœderal head, will soon bring ruin on the whole
— George Washington, Thirteen sovereignties pulling against each other (November 5, 1786)
A historian arguing that the Confederation was more effective than the judgment in this letter would most likely cite
- the requisition system, under which states often paid little.
- the Northwest Ordinance's plan for settling the western territory.
- Spain's closing of the Mississippi to American commerce.
- private loans raised in Boston to field an army against Shays' Rebellion.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) the Northwest Ordinance's plan for settling the western territory.
- Requisitions were a famous failure: Congress asked the states for millions and often received almost nothing.
- The Northwest Ordinance organized the national domain, banned slavery there, and set a path for new states, the evidence historians use when they call the Confederation more than a failure.
- Spain's closure of the river in 1784 showed that Congress could not defend western trade, which supports the criticism.
- Merchants had to lend the money because Congress could not fund troops, which is evidence of weakness.
Skill: Support an argument with evidence
Question 22
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
any cession of our lands should be made in the most public manner, and by the united voice of the confederacy
— United Indian Nations, The united voice of the confederacy (December 18, 1786)
any cession of our lands should be made in the most public manner, and by the united voice of the confederacy; holding all partial treaties as void and of no effect.
— United Indian Nations to Congress, December 18, 1786
Disputes like the one expressed most directly contributed to which development in the following decade?
- War in the Ohio country, closed by the Treaty of Greenville
- Removal of the Cherokee to territory west of the Mississippi
- British withdrawal from the Great Lakes forts under the 1783 treaty
- Admission of the Northwest Territory into the Union as a single state
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) War in the Ohio country, closed by the Treaty of Greenville
- The confederacy's rejection of separate land cessions led to war in the Ohio country; the United States won in 1794, and the Treaty of Greenville in 1795 ceded much of what became Ohio.
- Cherokee removal came in the 1830s, under the Indian Removal Act, long after this 1786 address.
- Britain did not leave the Great Lakes forts under the 1783 treaty; it kept them into the 1790s, and this address is a Native claim about land.
- The Northwest Ordinance divided the territory into three to five states, admitted separately.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship