Faithful Subjects
1770 → 1775 → 1774
Question 1
Read the source
Petition · Verbatim
We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies
— Second Continental Congress; drafted by John Dickinson, Congress's petition to George III (Olive Branch Petition) (signed 8 July 1775)
We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies … a happy and permanent reconciliation … That your Majesty may enjoy a long and prosperous reign, and that your descendants may govern your dominions with honor to themselves and happiness to their subjects, is our sincere and fervent prayer.
— Second Continental Congress, Olive Branch Petition, drafted by John Dickinson, adopted July 5 and signed July 8, 1775
Which development most directly undermined the strategy reflected in the excerpt?
- The alliance between the United States and France in 1778
- The Proclamation of Rebellion and the Prohibitory Act
- Parliament's repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766
- Ratification of the Articles of Confederation in 1781
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) The Proclamation of Rebellion and the Prohibitory Act
- The French alliance came in 1778, after independence had been declared, so it did not undo a reconciliation appeal that the king had already refused in 1775.
- In August 1775, before the petition was delivered, George III proclaimed the colonies in open rebellion and never answered them, and in December the Prohibitory Act cut off their trade, which pushed moderates away from reconciliation.
- Repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766 led colonists to thank the king, nine years before this petition, so it did not undercut a strategy Congress had not yet adopted.
- The Articles, drafted in 1776 and ratified in 1781, were a plan of union among the states after the break, not the act that killed the appeal of July 1775.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 2
Read the source
Petition · Verbatim
We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies
— Second Continental Congress; drafted by John Dickinson, Congress's petition to George III (Olive Branch Petition) (signed 8 July 1775)
We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies … a happy and permanent reconciliation … That your Majesty may enjoy a long and prosperous reign, and that your descendants may govern your dominions with honor to themselves and happiness to their subjects, is our sincere and fervent prayer.
— Second Continental Congress, Olive Branch Petition, drafted by John Dickinson, adopted July 5 and signed July 8, 1775
The excerpt best reflects which pattern in colonial protest between 1765 and 1775?
- Colonists sought seats in Parliament as their chief political goal
- Colonists asked Britain for troops to protect them from Native nations
- Colonists kept loyalty to the king and blamed Parliament and ministers
- Colonists accepted parliamentary taxes if the revenue stayed in America
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Colonists kept loyalty to the king and blamed Parliament and ministers
- From the Stamp Act Congress onward, colonists denied that Parliament could tax them and did not make seats at Westminster their aim.
- After 1763 many colonists resented the standing army and the ban on western settlement, so asking for more British troops was not the pattern of these protests.
- Through 1775, Congress and earlier protests still called the colonies loyal subjects and aimed their grievances at Parliament and the king's ministers, which is why this petition addresses George III rather than Parliament.
- Colonists rejected taxation without the consent of their own assemblies, and keeping the money in America would not have cured that objection.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
The Nobody
1774–1776
Question 3
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned Ruffians that ever lived. […] in America THE LAW IS KING.
— Thomas Paine (published anonymously), Common Sense — first edition (January 1776)
One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in Kings, is, that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an Ass for a Lion.
— Thomas Paine, Common Sense, January 1776
Paine's argument most directly reflects which broader intellectual development?
- Enlightenment confidence that merit and reason outrank inherited status
- The Puritan teaching that God predestined the fate of each soul
- Mercantilist theory that colonies exist to enrich the mother country
- The British claim that colonists were virtually represented in Parliament
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Enlightenment confidence that merit and reason outrank inherited status
- Enlightenment writers, Locke chief among those the colonists read, grounded government in consent and valued individual talent over rank passed down by birth, which is the case Paine makes against hereditary kings.
- Predestination is a seventeenth-century doctrine about salvation, and the Great Awakening's lesson was that ordinary people could question religious authority, not that birth should decide who rules.
- Mercantilism was an imperial theory about trade and revenue, and it does not supply an argument against crowns inherited at birth.
- Virtual representation was Parliament's defense of taxing colonists who elected no members, and it is a claim about the House of Commons rather than about hereditary monarchy.
Skill: Explain how an argument connects to a broader development
Question 4
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned Ruffians that ever lived. […] in America THE LAW IS KING.
— Thomas Paine (published anonymously), Common Sense — first edition (January 1776)
A government of our own is our natural right. … in America THE LAW IS KING.
— Thomas Paine, Common Sense, January 1776
Compared with most colonial protest writing of 1765–1774, Common Sense differed chiefly in that it
- rested its case on the traditional rights of Englishmen
- made boycotts of British goods its central demand
- accepted Parliament's trade laws but rejected taxes for revenue
- attacked the king and the institution of monarchy
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) attacked the king and the institution of monarchy
- The rights of Englishmen were the ground of the Stamp Act protests in 1765 and of the First Continental Congress in 1774, and Paine moved past them to natural rights held by people who were not English.
- Boycotts were the tactic of the Stamp Act crisis, the Townshend protests, and the Continental Association, and Common Sense demanded independence rather than another suspension of trade.
- Writers such as Dickinson had accepted Parliament's regulation of imperial trade while denying it the power to tax for revenue, which is an earlier and narrower quarrel than Paine's.
- Earlier protests blamed Parliament and the king's ministers and still professed loyalty to George III, whereas Common Sense in January 1776 attacked the king and monarchy itself and called a government of their own a natural right.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Read It Aloud
1776
Question 5
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
Limited monarchy is the form of government which is most favourable to liberty—which is best adapted to the genius and temper of Britons;
— Charles Inglis (published anonymously), The Deceiver Unmasked / The True Interest of America Impartially Stated (1776)
The excerpt best serves as evidence for which of the following?
- Most colonists had embraced independence before fighting began in 1775
- Opposition to independence among colonists remained strong in 1776
- Anglican clergy took the lead in the movement for independence
- Colonists widely agreed that monarchy itself was illegitimate
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Opposition to independence among colonists remained strong in 1776
- Fighting began at Lexington and Concord in April 1775, and that July Congress was still asking the king for peace, so independence was not the settled colonial position before the war.
- Inglis, an Anglican minister in New York, published this Loyalist reply to Common Sense in 1776, and about one colonist in five, including most Anglican clergy, stayed with the king.
- Most Anglican clergy and royal officials remained loyal to the king, so they were not the leaders of the push for independence.
- Paine attacked monarchy, but Inglis and other Loyalists argued that a limited monarchy protected liberty, so colonists had not agreed that kingship itself was illegitimate.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 6
Read the source
Newspaper · Verbatim
I am certain that I am within compass when I say one hundred and twenty thousand.
— Thomas Paine, writing as The Forester, The Forester's Letter II: Paine's circulation claim (Written 8 April; printed 10 April 1776)
Paine's purpose in making this claim was most likely to
- answer Loyalist charges that he was profiting from the war
- submit a sales report to the Continental Congress
- persuade readers that support for independence was already widespread
- argue that printed pamphlets should be taxed to fund the army
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) persuade readers that support for independence was already widespread
- The figure is a claim about copies of Common Sense in a newspaper fight with the Loyalist writer Cato, not a reply to a charge that Paine was making money from the war.
- He published the number in the Pennsylvania Journal while answering a critic, and it was not an accounting delivered to Congress.
- In that April 1776 exchange Paine used a huge circulation figure to make independence look like a cause that had already spread, and Common Sense did move quickly and turned many colonists toward independence, though no surviving ledger confirms 120,000 copies.
- A tax on pamphlets would have repeated the parliamentary taxation colonists had fought since the Stamp Act, and Paine was arguing for a break with Britain rather than for a new tax.
Skill: Explain the purpose of a source
Question 7
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
Limited monarchy is the form of government which is most favourable to liberty—which is best adapted to the genius and temper of Britons;
— Charles Inglis (published anonymously), The Deceiver Unmasked / The True Interest of America Impartially Stated (1776)
Which group would most likely have shared Inglis's view?
- Sons of Liberty who organized resistance to imperial taxes
- Committees of correspondence that linked colonial protests
- Readers who took Common Sense as a case for independence
- Loyalists who wanted to remain under a limited monarchy
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Loyalists who wanted to remain under a limited monarchy
- The Sons of Liberty led protests against taxes such as the Stamp Act, which put them on the opposite side of a defense of British rule.
- Committees of correspondence spread the colonial protests of the early 1770s, coordinating resistance rather than loyalty to the Crown.
- Readers who accepted Common Sense were being urged to break with the king, and Inglis wrote this pamphlet to refute that argument.
- Loyalists stayed with the king, and Inglis's defense of limited monarchy as favorable to liberty is the position that camp took in 1776.
Skill: Explain the point of view of a source
A Sentence Too Large
June 1776
Question 8
Read the source
Draft declaration · Verbatim
that all men are created equal & independant, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, […] he has waged cruel war against human nature itself,
— Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson’s original Rough draught (June 1776)
that whenever any form of government shall become destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, & to institute new government
— Thomas Jefferson, rough draft of the Declaration of Independence, June 1776
The principle in the excerpt most directly challenged which widely held eighteenth-century assumption?
- Kings held power by divine right and by birth
- Colonial assemblies could levy their own taxes
- Trade should be regulated to benefit the empire
- Protestant churches should receive legal toleration
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Kings held power by divine right and by birth
- Locke's social contract, which Jefferson used, held that people are by nature free and equal and that power comes from the consent of the governed, which denies both the divine right of kings and rule inherited by birth.
- Colonial assemblies had long taxed their own communities, and a right to replace a destructive government does not dispute that local practice.
- Mercantilist regulation of trade for the empire's benefit is an economic policy, and the draft's principle is about where political authority comes from.
- Toleration among Protestant churches was a religious dispute in the colonies, and the right to alter a government answers a claim about political power rather than about church law.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 9
Read the source
Adopted declaration of rights · Verbatim
when they enter into a state of society,
— Virginia Convention; drafted by George Mason and amended by the convention, Virginia Declaration of Rights, article I (June 12, 1776)
That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity;
— Virginia Declaration of Rights, Article I, adopted June 12, 1776; George Mason's draft, amended by the convention
The qualifying phrase is best explained by which of the following?
- Quaker antislavery petitions persuaded Virginia to narrow the clause
- British officials pressed Virginia's convention to restrict the vote
- Virginia's convention planned to abolish slavery gradually after the war
- Slaveholders issued a rights claim and left slavery in place
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Slaveholders issued a rights claim and left slavery in place
- Quaker antislavery petitions pressed Pennsylvania and other meetings, and they did not lead Virginia's convention to add a phrase that narrowed who counted as being in society.
- In June 1776 the Virginia convention was replacing royal government, Britain was not writing its rights article, and the phrase concerns membership in society rather than a parliamentary voting rule.
- Virginia adopted no plan of gradual abolition after the war, and the phrase was used to limit the promise rather than to schedule emancipation.
- The convention added "when they enter into a state of society" to Mason's rights article, and slaveholders used it to argue that enslaved people stood outside the promise, even as Jefferson wrote of equal creation while Robert Hemings, a teenager he enslaved, served him in Philadelphia.
Skill: Explain the historical situation of a source
Silence Would Be Guilt
July 1776
Question 10
Read the source
Speech notes; not a transcript · Verbatim
Let them know it is only deferred till a Confederation or a Treaty with Foreign Powers is concluded.
— John Dickinson, Notes on postponing a declaration of independence (July 1, 1776)
Dickinson's concerns were most directly addressed by which later developments?
- The Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774
- The federal Bill of Rights and the Judiciary Act of 1789
- The Articles of Confederation and the 1778 alliance with France
- Jay's Treaty with Britain and the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) The Articles of Confederation and the 1778 alliance with France
- The Proclamation of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774 came before this speech and were among the grievances of the imperial crisis, so they did not answer his call for a union and a foreign treaty.
- The Judiciary Act of 1789 and the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, belong to the federal Constitution, not to the confederation or the wartime alliance he said should come first.
- Dickinson, whose committee drafted the Articles in 1776, wanted a confederation and a foreign treaty before independence; Congress adopted the Articles in 1777, the states ratified them in 1781, and France allied with the United States in 1778, supplying that union and that ally after the declaration rather than before it.
- Jay's Treaty in 1794 settled some disputes with Britain, and the Whiskey Rebellion that year was a protest against a federal excise, so neither was the confederation or the French alliance.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 11
Read the source
Speech notes · not a transcript · Verbatim
I had rather they should hate Me, than that I should hurt them.
— John Dickinson, Arguments against independence: Dickinson’s speech notes (July 1, 1776)
Silence would be guilt.
— John Dickinson, notes for his speech against an immediate declaration, July 1, 1776
The debate in Congress in July 1776 most directly illustrates that
- Independence had been Congress's settled aim since the First Continental Congress
- Leaders who shared grievances still split over declaring independence
- Most delegates still granted Parliament the right to tax the colonies
- The week's central dispute was whether to abolish slavery
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Leaders who shared grievances still split over declaring independence
- The First Continental Congress in 1774 still called the colonies loyal British subjects and blamed Parliament rather than the king, so independence was not a decision it had already made.
- Dickinson, who had written the Olive Branch Petition, spoke on July 1 against declaring immediately and stayed away on July 2, when twelve colonies approved Lee's resolution and New York abstained pending instructions from home.
- By July 1776 the question on the floor was independence, and Dickinson himself had long denied Parliament's right to tax the colonies.
- Lee's resolution, not a bill to end slavery, was the vote of July 2, and the slave-trade passage was a separate argument inside Jefferson's draft.
Skill: Compare arguments in a historical debate
He Has
July 1776
Question 12
Read the source
Declaration · Verbatim
it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it […] For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
— Second Continental Congress, Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
— Second Continental Congress, Declaration of Independence, grievance against the king, July 4, 1776
This grievance is best understood in the context of which development?
- Native alliances with Britain after the 1763 limit on western settlement
- Native nations adopting republican constitutions on the frontier
- Congressional treaties securing Native land east of the Mississippi
- A French campaign to restore its North American empire in 1776
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Native alliances with Britain after the 1763 limit on western settlement
- Since 1763 Britain had tried to keep settlers west of the Appalachians, off Native land, and many Native nations sided with Britain for that reason, which the Declaration's frontier charge obscures.
- Native nations in 1776 were not adopting American-style republican constitutions, and written instruments such as the Cherokee constitution of 1827 belong to a later generation.
- Congress in 1776 did not guarantee Native title east of the Mississippi, and settler pressure ran toward the western land Britain had tried to close.
- France had lost mainland North America in 1763 and did not return in 1776 to rebuild that empire; its treaty with the United States came in 1778 and did not restore French rule on the frontier.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 13
Read the source
Draft declaration · Verbatim
that all men are created equal & independant, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, […] he has waged cruel war against human nature itself,
— Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson’s original Rough draught (June 1776)
Draft, June 1776: he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere.
Recollection, 1821: The clause too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia,
— Thomas Jefferson, rough draft, June 1776, and his Autobiography, 1821, on Congress's deletion of the clause
Congress's removal of the passage best illustrates which pattern of the Revolutionary era?
- Southern delegates discarded the Declaration's natural-rights preamble
- A British veto stopped Congress from abolishing slavery
- Northern delegates made emancipation a condition of union
- Delegates cut a slavery charge to keep the states together
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Delegates cut a slavery charge to keep the states together
- Southern delegates voted for independence and left the preamble's natural-rights language in place, objecting to the slave-trade charge rather than to the idea of natural rights.
- Britain cast no veto over an American emancipation statute in 1776, and the deleted lines were an accusation against the king, not a law freeing anyone.
- Northern delegates did not make immediate emancipation the price of the Declaration; Jefferson later remembered them as uneasy because their merchants had carried enslaved people.
- Congress cut the whole passage, which accused the king over the slave trade and was not a plan to free anyone, and Jefferson recalled in 1821 that the cut pleased South Carolina and Georgia, which wanted the trade continued, and spared northern carriers, sacrificing the charge to hold the coalition of states.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Melted Majesty
July 1776–November 1777 · c.1776 essay
Question 14
Read the source
Unpublished essay · Verbatim
Even an affrican, has Equally as good a right to his Liberty in common with Englishmen.
— Lemuel Haynes, Liberty Further Extended: Or Free Thoughts on the Illegality of Slave-keeping (c. 1776)
The ideas in the excerpt most directly contributed to which development in the decades after 1776?
- The spread of cotton plantations across the Deep South
- The Federalist campaign for a stronger national government in the 1780s
- Northern laws for gradual emancipation and Black freedom petitions
- The rise of Manifest Destiny as a national mission
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Northern laws for gradual emancipation and Black freedom petitions
- Cotton spread across the Deep South after the cotton gin of 1793 and slavery grew there, which ran against Haynes's claim rather than following from it.
- The campaign for a stronger central government in the 1780s grew out of the weakness of the Articles and unrest such as Shays' Rebellion, not out of an argument for the liberty of Africans.
- Haynes turned the Declaration's liberty claim toward Africans, Prince Hall and other Black petitioners asked Massachusetts for freedom in that language in 1777, and northern states then passed gradual emancipation laws, beginning with Pennsylvania in 1780.
- Manifest Destiny is a name for expansionist belief in the 1840s, the wrong generation, and it was not an effect of Haynes's case for African liberty.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 15
Read the source
Account with retrospective family note · Verbatim
an account of the number of cartridges made.
— Oliver Wolcott; explanatory note by Oliver Wolcott Jr., Litchfield cartridge account and the later statue note (1776)
The ladies of this village converted the lead into cartridges, of which the preceding is an account.
— Oliver Wolcott Jr., note on the Litchfield cartridge account, printed in George C. Woodruff, History of the Town of Litchfield (1845); the work was done in 1776
The account best illustrates which development during the war?
- State constitutions gave married women their own property but not the vote
- Women supplied the Patriot army but received no new political rights
- Women's munitions labor brought Loyalist resistance in New England to an end
- Congress drafted women to serve in a national corps of munitions workers
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Women supplied the Patriot army but received no new political rights
- The state constitutions of the 1770s left coverture in place, so a married woman's property still folded into her husband's, and withholding the vote did not make the property claim true.
- Women and girls in Litchfield turned lead from the king's statue into 42,088 musket cartridges for Patriot forces, which was supply work for the war, and it brought them neither the vote nor office.
- Loyalists remained in New England and elsewhere through the war, and cartridge making in one Connecticut town did not end their resistance.
- Congress did not conscript women into a national munitions service; the Litchfield labor was local work around a scarce supply of lead.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Final Review
1770–1777
Question 16
Read the source
Federal law · Adapted
1775, petition to George III (separate verbatim excerpts): “We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies” … “a happy and permanent reconciliation” 1776, Declaration of Independence (separate verbatim excerpts): “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” … “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States;”
— Continental Congress; editorial pairing of two documents, Congress’s public language, 1775 and 1776 (July 1775 / July 4, 1776)
1775: We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies … a happy and permanent reconciliation.
1776: That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
— Second Continental Congress, Olive Branch Petition, July 1775, and Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
The 1776 passage differs most from the 1775 petition in that Congress
- blamed Parliament by name for the first time
- turned from reconciliation to separation based on rights
- set natural rights aside for the divine right of kings
- traded individual rights for seats in Parliament
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) turned from reconciliation to separation based on rights
- The Declaration does not mention Parliament, and protests from the Stamp Act through 1774 had already blamed Parliament, so 1776 was not the first time that charge appeared.
- In July 1775 Congress still addressed George III as faithful subjects and asked him to restore peace, and on July 4, 1776, it grounded government in natural rights and consent and declared the colonies independent.
- The Declaration rejects divine right, locating just powers in the consent of the governed and allowing a people to alter a government that destroys their rights.
- Congress in 1776 did not ask for seats in Parliament; it declared the political connection dissolved and rested the case on rights that did not depend on English birth.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Question 17
Read the passage
And I do hereby farther declare all indentured Servants, Negroes, or others, (appertaining to Rebels,) free that are able and willing to bear Arms, they joining his Majesty's Troops as soon as may be, for the more speedily reducing this Colony to a proper Sense of their Duty, to his Majesty's Crown and Dignity.
— John Murray, Earl of Dunmore, proclamation issued off Norfolk, November 7, 1775
Dunmore's offer most directly contributed to which development?
- Harder resistance from Southern slaveholders who feared armed escapes
- A congressional statute of 1776 abolishing slavery in the colonies
- Parliament's repeal of the Stamp Act in exchange for colonial loyalty
- A land treaty in which Native nations accepted Dunmore's freedom offer
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Harder resistance from Southern slaveholders who feared armed escapes
- In November 1775 Virginia's royal governor promised freedom to enslaved men who left rebel owners and joined his forces, hundreds reached his lines, and the offer hardened Southern planters against Britain.
- Congress passed no emancipation law in 1776, and the slave-trade accusation it cut from the Declaration was not a statute freeing anyone.
- Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766, after colonial boycotts, nine years before Dunmore's proclamation and for a different reason.
- Dunmore's offer ran to enslaved people and indentured servants held by rebels in Virginia, not to a cession of land by Native nations, whose alignment with Britain had to do with the defense of western land.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 18
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned Ruffians that ever lived. […] in America THE LAW IS KING.
— Thomas Paine (published anonymously), Common Sense — first edition (January 1776)
That the Almighty hath here entered his protest against monarchical government is true, or the scripture is false. … A government of our own is our natural right.
— Thomas Paine, Common Sense, January 1776
Paine's use of scripture and of natural right together most directly reflects which pairing?
- Puritan predestination and the divine right of kings
- Mercantilist trade rules and virtual representation
- Great Awakening doubt of authority, and Enlightenment natural rights
- A nonintervening Creator, and the traditional rights of Englishmen
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Great Awakening doubt of authority, and Enlightenment natural rights
- Predestination concerns salvation, and divine right defends kings, whereas Paine uses scripture to attack monarchy.
- Mercantilism and virtual representation were British defenses of trade laws and of taxation without colonial members of Parliament, not the sources of this attack on kings.
- The Great Awakening of the 1730s and 1740s taught people to question religious authority, and Paine turned the Bible against kings, while the claim of a natural right to their own government comes from the Enlightenment argument, associated with Locke, that rights belong to people as people.
- Deism, which Jefferson leaned toward, pictures a Creator who set nature running and rarely intervenes, but these lines rely on scripture, and Paine claims natural rights rather than the rights of Englishmen.
Skill: Explain how an argument connects to a broader development
Question 19
Read the source
Unpublished essay · Verbatim
Even an affrican, has Equally as good a right to his Liberty in common with Englishmen.
— Lemuel Haynes, Liberty Further Extended: Or Free Thoughts on the Illegality of Slave-keeping (c. 1776)
Haynes's argument best supports which conclusion about the Revolution's ideals?
- The northern states abolished slavery during the summer of 1776
- Rights language in 1776 operated as a privilege of English birth
- Organizers at Seneca Falls in 1848 discarded natural-rights claims
- People shut out of power used the ideals against that exclusion
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) People shut out of power used the ideals against that exclusion
- Northern emancipation came later and was gradual; Pennsylvania's 1780 law freed no one already enslaved, and independence in the summer of 1776 did not end slavery in the North.
- Haynes denied that liberty stopped at English ancestry, placing Africans under the same right he said Englishmen claimed.
- At Seneca Falls in 1848, activists rewrote the Declaration to say that all men and women are created equal, which uses natural-rights language rather than dropping it.
- Haynes, a Black minuteman, turned the Declaration's liberty claim toward Africans around 1776, Prince Hall's petition asked Massachusetts for freedom in that language in 1777, and Seneca Falls later extended the same words, so the ideals became arguments against exclusions the governments of 1776 left standing.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 20
Read the source
Retrospective autobiography · Verbatim
The clause too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia,
— Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography: the deleted slave-trade passage (1821)
Which limitation most affects the use of this account to explain the 1776 deletion?
- It is an 1821 recollection by the author of the draft
- Jefferson was absent while Congress revised the Declaration
- South Carolina and Georgia had banned the slave trade by 1776
- It is a speech he gave in Congress on July 4, 1776
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) It is an 1821 recollection by the author of the draft
- Jefferson wrote this account in 1821, forty-five years after he watched Congress edit the draft, and he had a stake in how his own text was remembered, so it has to be checked against the 1776 draft and the records of that summer.
- He was present: from July 2 to July 4 he sat in Congress while the delegates revised his draft line by line.
- South Carolina and Georgia wanted the African trade to continue, which is why he said the clause was cut to please them, and they had not banned it.
- The autobiography is a memoir of 1821, not a speech of July 4, 1776, the day Congress adopted the Declaration.
Skill: Explain how a source's situation limits its use
Question 21
Read the source
Book · Adapted
Paine, Common Sense (February 14 expanded edition, verbatim excerpt): “As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture” Inglis, The Deceiver Unmasked (1776, verbatim excerpt): “Limited monarchy is the form of government which is most favourable to liberty—which is best adapted to the genius and temper of Britons;”
— Thomas Paine and Charles Inglis; editorial pairing, Competing arguments about liberty and monarchy (1776)
Paine: That the Almighty hath here entered his protest against monarchical government is true, or the scripture is false.
Inglis: Limited monarchy is the form of government which is most favourable to liberty—which is best adapted to the genius and temper of Britons;
— Thomas Paine, Common Sense, January 1776, and Charles Inglis, The Deceiver Unmasked, 1776
The disagreement between these writers most directly reflects which split in 1776?
- Whether Parliament ought to repeal the Stamp Act again
- Whether liberty needed an end to kingship or a limited monarchy
- Whether the colonies should seek seats in the House of Commons
- Whether the new governments should establish the Anglican Church
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Whether liberty needed an end to kingship or a limited monarchy
- Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766, and the argument between Paine and Inglis in 1776 was about independence and the form of government, not about repeating that repeal.
- Paine held that kingship could not be justified and that Americans should form their own government, while Inglis answered, for the Loyalists, that limited monarchy was the form most favorable to liberty.
- Neither writer was asking for colonial members of Parliament: Paine wanted a separate government, and Inglis wanted the connection to the Crown kept.
- Inglis was an Anglican minister and most Anglican clergy were Loyalists, but these passages argue about monarchy and liberty, not about establishing the Church of England.
Skill: Compare the arguments of two sources