The Ferry
January–June 1675
Question 1
Read the passage
Another Grievance, the English Catell and Horses still incresed; that when thay removed 30 Mill from where English had ani thing to do, thay could not kepe ther Corn from being spoyled, thay never being iused to fence, and thoft when the English boft Land of them thay wold have kept their Catell upon ther owne Land.
— John Easton, deputy governor of Rhode Island, reporting the complaints of Metacom's council in June 1675, A Relacion of the Indyan Warre (dated February 1676)
The grievance in the excerpt most directly reflects which development in seventeenth-century New England?
- Puritan missionaries gathered Native converts into separate praying towns.
- English farms and roaming livestock spread onto lands Native people farmed.
- The Navigation Acts limited the ports where colonists could ship their goods.
- The fur trade left Native hunters in debt to English and Dutch merchants.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) English farms and roaming livestock spread onto lands Native people farmed.
- John Eliot's praying towns did gather converts by the 1670s, but they did not bring English cattle into Wampanoag cornfields.
- As English towns multiplied, their cattle and hogs roamed into unfenced Native fields, and land disputes like this one helped cause Metacom's War in 1675.
- The Navigation Acts of 1660 and 1663 regulated colonial shipping; they had nothing to do with livestock on Native land.
- By the 1670s beaver were scarce in southern New England and the fur trade had moved north and west, so trade debt was not the issue here.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 2
Read the source
Eyewitness relation · spelling modernized · Verbatim
But I am confident it would be best for English and Indians that a peace were made upon honest terms for each to have a due propriety and to enjoy it without oppression or usurpation by one to the other.
— John Easton, Easton asks for peace on honest terms (February 5, 1676)
Which aspect of Easton's situation best explains the point of view expressed in the excerpt?
- He was a Plymouth magistrate who had approved the trial of Sassamon's accused killers.
- He was a Puritan minister who explained the war as God's judgment on New England.
- He was a Quaker from a colony that was left out of the alliance fighting the war.
- He was a royal agent sent from London to report on obedience to the trade laws.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) He was a Quaker from a colony that was left out of the alliance fighting the war.
- Easton held office in Rhode Island, which had no authority over Plymouth's courts or its land dealings.
- Puritan ministers such as Increase Mather wrote of the war as God's judgment; Easton was a Quaker official who also faulted English conduct.
- Quakers opposed war, and Rhode Island stood outside the New England Confederation, so Easton could urge a peace that protected Native and English property alike.
- Edward Randolph came from London in 1676 to report on New England's trade; Easton was an elected officer of Rhode Island.
Skill: Explain the point of view of a source
Question 3
Read the passage
We, of the jury, one and all, both English and Indians, do jointly and with one consent agree upon a verdict: that Tobias, and his son Wampaquan, and Mattushunnamo, the Indians, who are the prisoners, are guilty of the blood of John Sassamon, and were the murderers of him, according to this bill of indictment.
— Verdict of the jury in the Sassamon murder trial, Plymouth Colony court, June 1675
The verdict in the excerpt helped bring on war in 1675 mainly because
- Plymouth was claiming the power to try and execute Wampanoag men.
- Plymouth had already seized Mount Hope, Metacom's home on the bay.
- the New England Confederation had just ordered Metacom's people disarmed.
- Plymouth had begun selling Wampanoag captives into slavery overseas.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Plymouth was claiming the power to try and execute Wampanoag men.
- By trying and executing Wampanoag men for a killing among Native people, Plymouth claimed authority over Metacom's people, a direct challenge to Wampanoag sovereignty.
- Mount Hope remained Wampanoag land until the war; Plymouth gained it only after Metacom's defeat.
- It was Plymouth, not the confederation, that made Metacom surrender guns in 1671, four years before this trial.
- Plymouth began selling Native captives overseas later in 1675, after the fighting had started.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Choosing Sides
1675–1676 · westward interlude, 1679–1680
Question 4
Read the source
Colonial accounts compared · Verbatim
an hundred and fifty Mohegins, ready fixed to warr on the behalf of the English against the Narhagansets their mortal enemyes;
— William Hubbard; Benjamin and Thomas Church provide the companion accounts, Native alliances and the breakdown of the Narragansett peace (1677)
The excerpt best illustrates which pattern in colonial North America?
- Anglo-French rivalry pulled Native allies into wars between the two empires.
- Native nations united behind a single leader to halt English expansion.
- Colonies sold Native captives into slavery in the West Indies and beyond.
- Native groups joined colonists to fight Native rivals for their own reasons.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Native groups joined colonists to fight Native rivals for their own reasons.
- The Anglo-French wars that drew in Native allies began with King William’s War in 1689, and no French force fought in New England’s war of 1675–1676.
- Many Native nations, including the Mohegan, Pequot and Mohawk, fought against Metacom, so there was no single united front.
- New England did sell captives overseas, but that was a punishment imposed on enemies, not an alliance Native people chose.
- The Mohegan under Uncas had fought the Narragansett for decades and joined the English to defeat an old rival, as many Native nations allied with Europeans against Native enemies.
Skill: Identify a pattern among historical developments
Question 5
Read the source
Written account · Verbatim
… Christian Indians confined to Deer Island … they lived chiefly upon clams and shell-fish, that they digged out of the sand, at low water; the Island was bleak and cold, their wigwams poor and mean, their clothes few and thin
— Daniel Gookin, An Historical Account of the Doings and Sufferings of the Christian Indians in New England (1677)
Gookin most likely wrote the account in the excerpt in order to
- justify confining Native converts as a necessary wartime safeguard
- show that Christian Native people had suffered unjustly in the war
- prove that missionary work had failed to make sincere Native converts
- describe the hardships of English captives held by Metacom's allies
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) show that Christian Native people had suffered unjustly in the war
- Gookin opposed the internment and was threatened by other colonists for defending the converts.
- Gookin had overseen the Christian Indian towns since 1656 and wrote to defend converts whom Massachusetts interned in 1675, most of whom had stayed loyal to the colony.
- Gookin had supported John Eliot's missions for two decades and wrote to defend the converts' loyalty, not to call the missions a failure.
- Captivity narratives such as Mary Rowlandson's described English captives; Gookin wrote about Native converts held by Massachusetts.
Skill: Explain the purpose of a source
Question 6
Read the source
Reported speech in a military memoir · Verbatim
Great Captain, you have killed Philip, and conquered his country; for I believe that I and my company are the last that war against the English, so suppose the war is ended by your means; and therefore these things belong unto you.
— Annawon, as reported by Benjamin and Thomas Church, Annawon offers Philip’s belt, in Church’s later recollection (1716)
Which of the following best describes southern New England in the decades after the events in the excerpt?
- Plymouth recognized Wampanoag self-rule in return for Native military service.
- The colonies formed the New England Confederation to prevent another such war.
- Native numbers fell sharply, and English towns spread onto land survivors lost.
- England revoked the Massachusetts charter as punishment for causing the war.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Native numbers fell sharply, and English towns spread onto land survivors lost.
- Plymouth took Mount Hope and sold or confined many Wampanoag; it did not recognize their independence.
- The New England Confederation dated from 1643, had already coordinated this war, and was dissolved in 1684.
- Thousands of Native people died, were sold into slavery or fled north and west, and the survivors could no longer stop English settlement.
- England revoked the charter in 1684 because Massachusetts defied royal trade laws and authority, not as a penalty for the war.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Question 7
Read the source
Rebel manifesto · Verbatim
For having protected, favored, and emboldened the Indians against his Majesty's loyal subjects, never contriving, requiring, or appointing any due or proper means of satisfaction for their many invasions, robberies, and murders committed upon us.
— Nathaniel Bacon, The Declaration of the People (Bacon's Declaration in the Name of the People) (July 30, 1676)
The charge in the excerpt most directly reflects which tension in Virginia in the 1670s?
- Frontier farmers wanted Native land and resented the governor's planter allies.
- Tobacco planters resented royal laws that limited where they could sell their crop.
- Religious dissenters wanted freedom from Virginia's established Anglican church.
- Enslaved Africans plotted to escape south to freedom in Spanish Florida.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Frontier farmers wanted Native land and resented the governor's planter allies.
- Poorer frontier settlers wanted war on Native peoples and their land, and they blamed Governor Berkeley, who governed for the wealthy planters, for failing to protect them.
- Planters disliked the Navigation Acts, but Bacon's rising targeted Berkeley's Native policy and his favorites, not trade law.
- Virginia had an established church, but religion played little part in a revolt over frontier defense, land and power.
- Flight to Spanish Florida is linked to South Carolina and the Stono Rebellion of 1739, not to Virginia in 1676.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Two Knots Left
1668–1681
Question 8
Read the source
1669 famine report · English translation · Verbatim
a great many Indians perished of hunger, lying dead along the roads, in the ravines, and in their huts.
— Fray Juan Bernal, commissary of the Holy Office in New Mexico, Bernal’s report of the 1668 famine (April 1, 1669)
Which of the following, together with the conditions described in the excerpt, most directly contributed to the Pueblo Revolt of 1680?
- The New Laws of 1542, which limited the enslavement of Native subjects
- A casta system that ranked people in Spanish cities by their ancestry
- Encomienda demands for tribute and labor, and raids on Pueblo kivas
- The spread of Spanish horses and sheep into Native trade networks
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Encomienda demands for tribute and labor, and raids on Pueblo kivas
- The New Laws were meant to protect Native subjects and dated from more than a century earlier; they do not explain the Pueblo grievances of the 1670s.
- The casta system shaped status in Spanish cities, but Pueblo grievances centered on tribute, forced labor and attacks on their religion.
- Even during the famine, colonists collected corn and cloth under the encomienda and officials drafted Pueblo labor, while friars raided kivas, and these pressures drove the revolt.
- Native peoples did adopt Spanish animals, but that exchange did not cause the revolt; horses spread far more widely after it.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 9
Read the source
Later testimony, mediated by an editor · Adapted
Popé, however, was one of the medicine men whose release the Tewa warriors effectively demanded of Governor Treviño.
— Diego López Sambrano; account summarized by Charles Wilson Hackett, The 1675 prisoners: López Sambrano through Hackett's summary (December 22, 1681)
The arrests that led to the release described in the excerpt were part of a Spanish effort to
- suppress Pueblo religious leaders and the ceremonies they led
- collect tribute that Pueblo towns owed under the encomienda
- recruit Pueblo men as soldiers to fight against Apache raiders
- punish Pueblo towns for trading with French merchants
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) suppress Pueblo religious leaders and the ceremonies they led
- In 1675 Governor Juan Francisco Treviño had forty-seven Pueblo religious leaders arrested for sorcery and hanged three before armed Tewa men forced the others' release.
- Encomienda tribute was collected from households in corn and cloth; these arrests targeted religious leaders, not unpaid tribute.
- Spanish governors did use Pueblo fighters against Apache raiders, but these men were jailed and punished, not enlisted.
- No French traders reached New Mexico in 1675; France's posts lay far to the north and east.
Skill: Explain the broader historical context of a development
Question 10
Read the source
Two separate captive reports · English translation · Verbatim
English translation (1942 edition)
He sent it through all the pueblos as far as that of La Isleta, there remaining in the whole kingdom only the nation of the Piros who did not receive it
— Juan of Tesuque and Pedro Naranjo, separately examined by Spanish officials, The cord’s reach, smoke signals and the excluded Piro (December 18–19, 1681)
In the excerpt, “he” is Po’pay. The excerpt best supports which conclusion about the revolt of 1680?
- It began as a riot in Santa Fe and then spread to the outlying towns.
- It grew out of a quarrel between friars and the governor over labor.
- It followed orders from a hereditary ruler who governed from Taos.
- Leaders got towns that spoke different languages to rise together.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Leaders got towns that spoke different languages to rise together.
- The rising began in the towns on August 10 and Santa Fe was besieged afterward, so it was planned, not a spreading riot.
- Friars and governors did quarrel over Pueblo labor before 1680, but Pueblo leaders organized the revolt against both and killed twenty-one friars.
- Po'pay planned from Taos with other leaders, but each Pueblo town kept its own government and there was no hereditary king.
- Runners carried the plan from Taos south to Isleta, so towns that spoke Tewa, Tiwa, Keres and other languages rose together on August 10.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 11
Read the source
Recorded decision · adapted on-camera performance · Adapted
English translation (1942 edition)
it would be a better and safer step to die fighting than of hunger and thirst, shut up within the casas reales.
— Antonio de Otermín’s administration; attested by Francisco Xavier, The water is cut and the governor chooses a breakout (August 20–21, 1680)
The decision described in the excerpt led most directly to which of the following?
- Spanish troops crushed the rising and executed its leader, Po'pay, that year.
- Spanish colonists withdrew south, and Spain lost the Pueblo towns until 1692.
- French traders from Louisiana took over Santa Fe's trade with the Pueblos.
- Spain recognized the Pueblo towns as an independent nation in a treaty.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Spanish colonists withdrew south, and Spain lost the Pueblo towns until 1692.
- Po'pay was never captured; the Spanish fled, and the Pueblo towns ran their own affairs for twelve years.
- After breaking out of Santa Fe, Otermín led about a thousand survivors south, and Spain did not rule the northern Pueblos again until Diego de Vargas returned in 1692.
- France did not found Louisiana until 1699 and never controlled Santa Fe.
- Spain made no treaty with the rebels; it tried to return in 1681 and reclaimed the province under Vargas in 1692.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Opposite Endings
1676–1704
Question 12
Read the source
Interrogation record · performed adaptation · Adapted
English translation by Charmion Clair Shelby (1942 edition)
…the causes they gave were alleged ill treatment and injuries received from the present secretary, Francisco Xavier, and the maestre de campo, Alonso García, and from the sargentos mayores, Luis de Quintana and Diego López, because they beat them, took away what they had, and made them work without pay.
— Josephe; recorded and attested by Francisco Xavier; English translation by Charmion Clair Shelby, Josephe names the secretary who records his answer (December 19, 1681)
Which of the following types of evidence would best help a historian corroborate the complaints in the excerpt?
- Spanish military reports on the retaking of Santa Fe in 1693
- Complaints about forced labor recorded in New Mexico before 1680
- Lists of the colonists who resettled New Mexico after 1692
- A later Spanish chronicle that summarized this same declaration
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) Complaints about forced labor recorded in New Mexico before 1680
- Reports on the 1693 reconquest describe events after the revolt and cannot show how officials treated Pueblo workers before 1680.
- Records made before 1680 by people other than the accused officials could independently confirm whether such beatings, seizures and unpaid labor were common.
- Who returned after 1692 says nothing about how officials treated Pueblo workers in the 1670s.
- A chronicle built on the same declaration only repeats it, so it cannot check it independently.
Skill: Explain how evidence supports a claim
Question 13
Read the source
Interrogation record · translated reported order · Adapted
English translation (1942 edition)
now they were as they had been in ancient times, free from the labor they had performed for the religious and the Spaniards
— Pedro Naranjo, recorded by Spanish officials, Declaration of Pedro Naranjo of the Queres Nation (December 19, 1681)
Compared with the grievances behind Metacom's War, the order reported in the excerpt suggests that the Pueblo Revolt was driven more by
- rivalry between European empires than by disputes with nearby colonists
- competition in the fur trade than by Spanish attacks on Pueblo religion
- colonial demands on Native labor than by settlers taking Native farmland
- taxes set by officials in Spain than by local colonists and friars
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) colonial demands on Native labor than by settlers taking Native farmland
- No rival empire was involved in New Mexico in 1680; in both regions Native people fought the colonists who lived among them.
- The fur trade mattered little in New Mexico, and raids on kivas were a major Pueblo grievance.
- New England's fast-growing settler population mainly wanted Wampanoag land, while New Mexico's few colonists lived on Pueblo labor and crops, which Po'pay told the towns to stop providing.
- The burdens Pueblo people resented came from local colonists, officials and friars, not from royal taxes set in Spain.
Skill: Compare related historical developments
Question 14
Read the source
Reported offer · first-person adaptation · Adapted
Don Juan offered to call his Pecos warriors.
— John L. Kessell, reporting Juan de Ye’s offer in his account of Vargas’s campaign, Juan de Ye offers to summon Pecos warriors (December 1693)
The offer described in the excerpt was most similar to which development in New England during Metacom's War?
- Massachusetts confined Christian Native people on an island in Boston Harbor.
- Rhode Island's deputy governor proposed that neutral judges settle the dispute.
- Plymouth's court tried and executed three Wampanoag men for a murder.
- Mohegan and Pequot warriors fought for the English against Metacom.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Mohegan and Pequot warriors fought for the English against Metacom.
- The Deer Island internment came from colonial suspicion of Native people, not from a Native leader choosing to fight beside colonists.
- Easton's plan for arbitration was an English attempt at mediation, not a Native alliance against other Native people.
- The Sassamon trial extended Plymouth's courts over the Wampanoag, the kind of pressure that caused the war.
- Like the Mohegan and Pequot, longtime rivals of the Wampanoag, Juan de Ye's Pecos fighters joined a colonial army against other Native towns for reasons of their own.
Skill: Compare related historical developments
Question 15
Read the source
Land petition · archival translation · Verbatim
English translation
Therefore, and on account of what belongs to us, we ask and request that your Excellency be pleased to order that the customary measurements be made without injury to us.
— San Ildefonso Pueblo, through protector Alfonso Rael de Aguilar, San Ildefonso asks for its land to be measured without injury (September 28, 1704)
The petition in the excerpt best serves as evidence that, after the reconquest of the 1690s,
- Pueblo towns could defend their lands through Spanish courts and officials.
- Pueblo towns governed themselves as states outside Spanish law and courts.
- Spanish settlers now outnumbered Pueblo people and held most of the farmland.
- Franciscan friars again banned the Pueblo ceremonies they had tolerated.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Pueblo towns could defend their lands through Spanish courts and officials.
- Spanish rule returned in a less harsh form, and Pueblo towns used legal channels such as this protector’s petition to defend their land.
- A petition asking the Spanish governor to act shows a town working inside Spanish law, not outside it.
- In the early 1700s colonists in New Mexico were still fewer than Pueblo people and depended on them for labor and defense.
- After 1692 missionaries tolerated more Pueblo ceremonies than before the revolt, not fewer.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
The Other Answers
1640s–1742
Question 16
Read the source
Manuscript treaty · Adapted
English translation
I therefore ratify today the peace … desiring that there be no more talk of all of the blows struck during the war, and I once again seize all your axes, and all your other instruments of war, which I place along with my own in a pit so deep that no one will be able to retrieve them to trouble the tranquility that I reestablish among my children
— Governor Louis-Hector de Callière and delegates of about forty nations, The Great Peace of Montreal (August 4, 1701)
French officials sought the agreement in the excerpt mainly because
- New France had few colonists and relied on Native allies for furs and defense
- French settlers needed peace to clear Native land for large tobacco farms
- the French Crown wanted Native workers for silver mines along the St. Lawrence
- Louis XIV had ordered missionaries to force Native nations to accept baptism
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) New France had few colonists and relied on Native allies for furs and defense
- In 1681 New France had fewer than ten thousand colonists, so it depended on Native hunters and warriors, and a general peace protected that trade and alliance system.
- Large tobacco farms marked the English Chesapeake; New France's small farms along the St. Lawrence did not drive this treaty.
- Forced Native labor in silver mines was a pattern of New Spain; New France had no such mines.
- Jesuit missionaries sought converts by persuasion among allied nations, and the treaty dealt with war and trade, not baptism.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 17
Read the source
Deed · Verbatim
… for ever quit claime unto our great Lord and Master the King of England … all that vast Tract of land or Colony called Canagariarchio … alwayes provided and it is hereby expected that wee are to have free hunting for us and the heires and descendants from us the Five nations for ever … expecting to be protected therein by the Crown of England
— Sachems of the Five Nations, to Lieutenant Governor John Nanfan, Deed from the Five Nations to the King of their Beaver Hunting Ground (July 19, 1701)
Within days of the agreement in the excerpt, Haudenosaunee delegates also made peace with New France at Montreal. The two agreements together best illustrate which of the following?
- The Haudenosaunee became English subjects and gave up separate diplomacy.
- France and England agreed to divide the Great Lakes fur trade between them.
- The Beaver Wars ended because the Haudenosaunee had conquered New France.
- Native nations used rivalry between empires to protect their own interests.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Native nations used rivalry between empires to protect their own interests.
- English officials read the deed as a surrender of land, but the Haudenosaunee kept dealing with France and largely stayed out of Queen Anne's War (1702–1713).
- No such Anglo-French agreement existed; the two empires were at war again by 1702.
- French and allied attacks in the 1690s had cost the Haudenosaunee heavily, which pushed them toward peace.
- By seeking English protection for their hunting grounds at Albany while making peace with France at Montreal, the Haudenosaunee kept both empires as partners and neither as master.
Skill: Identify a pattern among historical developments
Question 18
Read the source
Deed · Verbatim
… doth extend itself back into the Woods as far as a Man can goe in one day and a half, and bounded on the Westerly Side with the Creek called Neshameny, or the most Westerly branch thereof … We Do Acknowledge Ourselves and every of Us, to be fully satisfyed that the above described Tract or Tracts of Land were truly Granted and Sold
— Lenape leaders Monockyhickan, Lappawinzoe, Tisheekunk (Tishcohan) and Nutimus, Deed of Confirmation from Monockyhickan, Lappawinzoe, Tisheekunk and Nutimus to John, Thomas and Richard Penn (August 25, 1737)
Which of the following most directly challenges the deed's statement that the Lenape signers accepted the earlier sale?
- William Penn had bought land from the Lenape through treaties in the 1680s.
- The proprietors sold parts of the new tract to European settlers for profit.
- Lenape leaders protested the walk and refused to leave the land it claimed.
- Swedish and Dutch traders had dealt with the Lenape before Penn's arrival.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Lenape leaders protested the walk and refused to leave the land it claimed.
- Penn's earlier purchases were the background the proprietors cited; they do not show that the Lenape accepted the 1737 boundary.
- Selling the land shows what the Penns gained, not whether the Lenape agreed to the walk's result.
- Lenape observers objected that the walkers ran on a cleared path, and Lenape families stayed on the land until Pennsylvania brought in the Haudenosaunee in 1742 to order them out.
- New Sweden and New Netherland traded on the Delaware decades before 1737, which says nothing about this deed.
Skill: Explain how evidence challenges a claim
Question 19
Read the passage
And for all these Reasons we charge you to remove instantly; we don’t give you the Liberty to think about it. … Take the Advice of a wise Man, and remove immediately.
— Canasatego, Onondaga speaker for the Six Nations, to Lenape leaders at Philadelphia, July 12, 1742 (Conrad Weiser's English, printed 1743)
The speech in the excerpt best illustrates which of the following?
- The Lenape and the Haudenosaunee united to stop Pennsylvania's expansion.
- A Native confederacy used its English alliance to command other Native peoples.
- Pennsylvania's Quaker leaders refused to pressure Native people over land.
- French officials urged Native nations to leave the lands claimed by England.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) A Native confederacy used its English alliance to command other Native peoples.
- Canasatego sided with Pennsylvania and ordered the Lenape off the land, so the two peoples were divided, not united.
- Through the Covenant Chain, the Haudenosaunee claimed to speak for the Lenape and enforced the Walking Purchase, gaining standing with Pennsylvania at the Lenape's expense.
- Pennsylvania's officials invited the Haudenosaunee to Philadelphia to pressure the Lenape into leaving.
- The order came from an ally of the English at a council in Philadelphia; France had no part in it.
Skill: Identify a pattern among historical developments
Final Review
1675–1742
Question 20
Read the passage
New England colonists, about 1675: about 60,000
New Mexico colonists, 1680: fewer than 3,000
Pueblo people of New Mexico, 1680: about 16,000 (estimate)
New France colonists (St. Lawrence census), 1681: 9,677
— Estimates from the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States; Charles Wilson Hackett, Revolt of the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico (1942); census of New France, 1681
The figures best help explain which contrast between New France and New England in the late 1600s?
- New France admitted Protestant settlers, while New England turned them away.
- New France drafted Native workers for missions, while New England relied on trade.
- New France grew faster than New England by recruiting families from France.
- New France relied on Native trade partners, while New England took Native land.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) New France relied on Native trade partners, while New England took Native land.
- France barred Huguenots and other Protestants from New France, while New England was itself a Protestant society.
- Drafting Native labor for missions was a Spanish pattern, as in New Mexico; New France depended on Native hunters as trading partners.
- Few French families emigrated, which is why New France stayed far smaller than New England.
- With fewer than ten thousand colonists, New France lived by the fur trade and needed Native partners, while New England's sixty thousand settlers spread onto Native land.
Skill: Compare related historical developments
Question 21
Read the source
Retrospective letter · English translation · Verbatim
English translation (1942 edition)
I left without a crust of bread or a grain of wheat or maize
— Antonio de Otermín, Otermín describes leaving Santa Fe (September 8, 1680)
After Spain returned to the province the author describes leaving, Spanish officials responded to Pueblo resistance mainly by
- tolerating more Pueblo ceremonies while still drafting Pueblo workers
- restoring encomienda grants to the colonial families who had fled in 1680
- moving Pueblo towns onto reserved lands far from the Rio Grande
- replacing Pueblo farmers with settlers recruited from Spain
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) tolerating more Pueblo ceremonies while still drafting Pueblo workers
- After 1692 Spain did not restore the encomienda and missionaries allowed more Pueblo ceremonies, though labor drafts went on: a limited accommodation of Pueblo culture.
- The encomienda was not restored in New Mexico after the reconquest, although officials continued to draft Pueblo labor.
- Removal to reserved lands was a later U.S. policy; the Pueblo towns stayed in place and defended their land in Spanish courts.
- Spain did bring colonists back in 1693, but they remained few and depended on Pueblo food, labor and soldiers.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Question 22
Read the source
Captivity narrative · modernized selection with 1682 comparison · Adapted
I can remember the time, when I used to sleep quietly without workings in my thoughts, whole nights together, but now it is other wayes with me.
— Mary Rowlandson, Rowlandson remembers her sleepless nights (1682)
Rowlandson's narrative, first printed in 1682, is best understood as an example of
- a Quaker appeal for a peace that would protect Native and English property
- a Puritan account that presented captivity as a trial and mercy from God
- an official report defending Native converts interned during the war
- a planter manifesto accusing a governor of shielding Native enemies
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) a Puritan account that presented captivity as a trial and mercy from God
- That describes John Easton's relation of the war; Rowlandson was a Puritan minister's wife writing about her own captivity.
- Rowlandson titled her book The Sovereignty and Goodness of God and read her suffering and ransom as God’s testing and mercy; it went through four editions in 1682.
- Daniel Gookin wrote that defense of the Christian Indians interned on Deer Island; Rowlandson wrote about her own captivity.
- That describes Nathaniel Bacon's Declaration of 1676 against Governor Berkeley; Rowlandson wrote a religious account of her captivity.
Skill: Explain the purpose of a source
Question 23
Read the source
Interpreted speech · 1756 minutes, printed 1757 · Verbatim
This very Ground that is under me (striking it with his Foot) was my Land and Inheritance, and is taken from me by Fraud; when I say this Ground, I mean all the Land lying between Tohiccon Creek and Wioming, on the River Susquehannah.
— Teedyuscung, as recorded in the province’s minutes, Minutes of Conferences, held with the Indians, at Easton (Teedyuscung, November 13, 1756) (November 13, 1756)
Teedyuscung's complaint in the excerpt is most similar to which earlier grievance?
- Virginia frontier farmers' charge that their governor shielded Native enemies
- Pueblo complaints that colonists seized their corn and cloth as tribute
- Wampanoag complaints that the English cheated sachems in land deals
- Haudenosaunee requests for English protection of their hunting grounds
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Wampanoag complaints that the English cheated sachems in land deals
- Bacon's followers in 1676 wanted war on Native peoples; Teedyuscung was a Native leader protesting the loss of his people's land.
- Encomienda tribute took goods and labor, while Teedyuscung protested the loss of land through a disputed deed.
- Metacom's council told Easton in 1675 that the English cheated sachems and claimed more land than they had agreed to sell, as the Lenape said of the Walking Purchase.
- The 1701 Albany deed asked for English protection of hunting grounds, an alliance request rather than a protest against fraud.
Skill: Compare related historical developments
Question 24
Read the source
Military memoir · Verbatim
King Philip (as was before hinted) was fled to a place called Scattacook, between York and Albany, where the Moobags made a descent upon him & killed many of his men, which moved him from thence.
— Benjamin Church, recorded and edited by Thomas Church, The Mohawk attack on Metacom’s winter refuge (1716)
In the excerpt, “Moobags” means the Mohawk. Their attack is best understood in the context of
- the spread of horses north from Spanish New Mexico to the northeastern nations
- a Mohawk alliance with New France against the English colonies
- the conversion of Mohawk families in Puritan praying towns near Boston
- the Mohawk's alliance with New York, built on years of trade at Albany
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) the Mohawk's alliance with New York, built on years of trade at Albany
- Horses spread onto the Plains mainly after 1680 and played no part in Mohawk warfare in the Northeast.
- The Mohawk had fought New France and its Native allies for decades in the Beaver Wars; their trading partners were the Dutch and then the English.
- Praying towns were Puritan missions for southern New England Algonquians; the Mohawk lived in New York, outside Eliot's missions.
- The Mohawk had traded furs for Dutch and then English guns at Fort Orange, now Albany, and were New York's allies when they struck Metacom's camp.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context