Our Principall Wealth
Virginia and Maryland · 1607–1700
Question 1
Read the source
Printed history · Verbatim
the market-place, and streets, and all other spare places planted with Tobacco
— John Smith, compiling reports of Virginia, Tobacco in Jamestown's streets (1624)
The development described in the excerpt shaped settlement in the Chesapeake most directly by
- drawing colonists into compact towns built around a church and a common
- spreading plantations along rivers where ships could load at each dock
- pulling migrants inland to backcountry valleys far from the coast
- creating port cities where merchants milled grain and shipped it abroad
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) spreading plantations along rivers where ships could load at each dock
- Compact towns around a meetinghouse were the New England pattern; tobacco planters scattered across the countryside and built few towns.
- Tobacco needed fresh land and direct shipping, so planters spread out along the deep rivers of the Chesapeake and loaded their crop at their own docks.
- Settlers moved into the backcountry valleys in large numbers only in the 1700s, long after tobacco first spread along the tidewater rivers.
- Grain-exporting port cities such as Philadelphia grew in the middle colonies, while the tobacco economy kept the Chesapeake rural.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 2
Read the source
Written account · Verbatim
All our riches for the present doe consiste in Tobacco … Our principall wealth (I should have said) consisteth in servants
— John Pory, Pory corrects his account of Virginia's wealth (September 30, 1619)
Which Virginia policy most directly connected the two kinds of wealth Pory named?
- The election of burgesses to make laws with the governor and council
- A law making the children of enslaved mothers enslaved for life
- A grant of fifty acres to whoever paid for a migrant’s passage
- The Crown’s decision to take the colony away from its investors
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) A grant of fifty acres to whoever paid for a migrant’s passage
- The House of Burgesses first met in 1619 and gave planters a voice in lawmaking, but it did not tie land to the import of workers.
- Virginia made slavery hereditary in 1662, more than forty years after Pory wrote, and the law concerned enslaved Africans rather than servants.
- The headright system gave a sponsor fifty acres for each migrant he brought over, so planters who imported servants gained both land and workers for tobacco.
- Virginia became a royal colony in 1624, after Pory’s letter, and the change of rulers did not create the link between servants and tobacco land.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 3
Read the source
Governor's answers to inquiries · Verbatim
two thousand black slaves, six thousand christian servants, for a short time
— Sir William Berkeley, Berkeley estimates Virginia's population (1671)
Which development most directly changed the labor pattern described in the excerpt by 1700?
- Virginia became a royal colony after the Crown revoked the company’s charter.
- Barbados planters switched from tobacco to sugar worked by enslaved Africans.
- Maryland’s assembly passed a law protecting the worship of Christians.
- Fewer English servants arrived while slave traders brought in more Africans.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Fewer English servants arrived while slave traders brought in more Africans.
- Virginia became a royal colony in 1624, nearly fifty years before Berkeley’s count, so it cannot explain a change after 1671.
- Barbados turned to sugar in the 1640s, a Caribbean change that came well before Berkeley’s count and did not alter what Chesapeake planters grew.
- Maryland’s Toleration Act of 1649 dealt with religion, not labor, and it came two decades before Berkeley’s report.
- As fewer English migrants signed indentures later in the century and slave traders brought more Africans, slavery replaced servitude as the main Chesapeake labor system by 1700.
Skill: Explain a pattern of continuity and change
Hold Up Your Hands
Massachusetts and Rhode Island · 1635–1644
Question 4
Read the source
Reported anecdote · dramatized voice · Dramatization
Sir, you are mistaken, you think you are preaching to the people at the Bay; our main end was to catch fish.
— Cotton Mather, The fishing-settlement interruption, as Mather reports it (1702)
The reply in the excerpt best illustrates which feature of colonial New England?
- A mixed economy that combined small farms with fishing and trade
- Large estates that grew export crops with the labor of servants
- A tolerant society that welcomed settlers of many different faiths
- A fur trade with Native nations that needed only a few settlers
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) A mixed economy that combined small farms with fishing and trade
- Poor soil and a short growing season kept New England farms small, so colonists also fished, cut timber, built ships and traded.
- Export estates worked by bound laborers marked the Chesapeake, where tobacco paid; New England’s rocky soil grew no such staple crop.
- Massachusetts demanded conformity to one approved church, while broad religious diversity marked the middle colonies and Rhode Island.
- A fur trade that needed few settlers defined New France and New Netherland, while New England drew some twenty thousand English migrants in the 1630s.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 5
Read the source
Colonial law · Verbatim
for time to come noe man shalbe admitted to the freedome of this body polliticke, but such as are members of some of the churches within the lymitts of the same
— Massachusetts Bay General Court, Church membership and admission as a freeman (May 18, 1631)
The order in the excerpt most directly reflected the Massachusetts Bay founders’ goal of
- separating church affairs from the colony’s elected government
- giving the vote to men who owned land, whatever their beliefs
- protecting a Catholic minority from a Protestant assembly
- building a community in which shared faith guided civil rule
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) building a community in which shared faith guided civil rule
- Separating government from religion was Roger Williams’s position, and Massachusetts banished him for it in 1635.
- A property test without a church requirement came to Massachusetts with its 1691 charter; in 1631 the vote depended on church membership.
- Protecting Catholics was the aim of Maryland’s founders, the Calverts, not of the Puritans who governed Massachusetts.
- Puritans saw their colony as a covenant community, so they let only male church members become freemen who voted and held office.
Skill: Explain the purpose of a source
Question 6
Read the source
Court examination · later printed transcript · Verbatim
So to me by an immediate revelation. How! an immediate revelation. You have power over my body but the Lord Jesus hath power over my body and soul What is the scripture she brings? let them hold up their hands. you are banished from out of our jurisdiction as being a woman not fit for our society I desire to know wherefore I am banished? Say no more, the court knows wherefore and is satisfied.
— Anonymous record, printed by Thomas Hutchinson, The Examination of Mrs. Anne Hutchinson at Newtown (November 1637)
So to me by an immediate revelation. … You have power over my body but the Lord Jesus hath power over my body and soul
— Anne Hutchinson, examination before the General Court at Newtown, Massachusetts, November 1637, as printed by Thomas Hutchinson, 1767
The Massachusetts General Court banished the speaker in 1637 mainly because her claims
- repeated the inner-light teaching that Quaker missionaries carried to Boston
- challenged the religious authority of the colony’s ministers and magistrates
- defended the Church of England’s bishops against the Puritan reformers
- encouraged settlers to leave for new towns along the Connecticut River
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) challenged the religious authority of the colony’s ministers and magistrates
- Quakers emerged as a movement in the 1650s and first reached Boston in 1656, nearly twenty years after her trial.
- By claiming direct revelation and accusing ministers of false teaching, she challenged the leaders whose shared authority held the colony’s religious and civil order together.
- Hutchinson was a Puritan who accused most ministers of teaching salvation by good works; she did not side with the bishops the Puritans had left behind.
- Thomas Hooker led his congregation to Hartford in 1636, a move usually explained by a need for land and disputes with Boston’s leaders, not by her teaching.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 7
Read the passage
It is the will and command of God that, since the coming of his Son the Lord Jesus, a permission of the most paganish, Jewish, Turkish, or antichristian consciences and worships be granted to all men in all nations and countries
— Roger Williams, The Bloudy Tenent of Persecution, for Cause of Conscience, 1644 (spelling modernized)
Which development most directly led the author of the excerpt to found a new settlement in 1636?
- The Crown revoked the Massachusetts charter and named a royal governor.
- Plymouth’s Separatists signed a compact to govern themselves by majority.
- Massachusetts banished him for denying its power to rule over conscience.
- Massachusetts hanged Quakers who came back after they had been banished.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Massachusetts banished him for denying its power to rule over conscience.
- England revoked the Massachusetts charter in 1684, nearly fifty years after Williams left, and a royal governor arrived with the Dominion of New England in 1686.
- The Pilgrims signed the Mayflower Compact in 1620, and it governed Plymouth rather than the Massachusetts Bay colony that expelled Williams.
- Massachusetts banished Williams in 1635 for teaching that magistrates could not punish matters of belief, and in 1636 he founded Providence, the start of Rhode Island.
- Massachusetts hanged four Quakers between 1659 and 1661, more than twenty years after Williams founded Providence.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
The Holy Experiment
Pennsylvania and the Middle Colonies · 1656–1730
Question 8
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
there may be room there, tho not here, for such an holy experiment.
— William Penn, Penn calls his colony a holy experiment (August 25, 1681)
Penn’s plan for an “experiment” was most directly a response to
- the persecution of Quakers and other dissenters in England
- the founding of a Catholic refuge in neighboring Maryland
- Spanish raids on English settlements from bases in Florida
- falling tobacco prices that hurt the Chesapeake’s planters
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) the persecution of Quakers and other dissenters in England
- English law punished Quakers who worshipped outside the Church of England, and Penn himself had been jailed, so he sought a refuge for many faiths.
- The Calverts founded Maryland as a Catholic refuge in 1634, and its example did not prompt Penn’s Quaker plan nearly fifty years later.
- Fear of Spanish Florida shaped Georgia’s founding as a buffer colony in 1732, not Pennsylvania’s founding in 1681.
- Tobacco prices mattered to Chesapeake planters, while Penn planned his colony around religious refuge and family farms.
Skill: Explain the historical situation of a source
Question 9
Read the source
Letter · Verbatim
in short, of all sorts of opinions there are some, and the most part of none at all.
— Thomas Dongan, Dongan surveys New York’s religious variety (February 22, 1687)
The religious pattern Dongan described resulted most directly from
- a covenant that limited the vote to members of approved churches
- migrants from many European nations settling a former Dutch colony
- planters from Barbados who brought the Church of England with them
- a revival movement that split the colony’s churches into rival groups
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) migrants from many European nations settling a former Dutch colony
- Limiting the vote to church members was the Massachusetts practice, meant to keep one faith in charge rather than to welcome many.
- New York kept the Dutch settlers and churches of New Netherland after the English conquest of 1664 and drew migrants of many faiths from across Europe.
- Barbados planters helped settle Carolina in 1670, not New York, and they brought a plantation economy rather than religious variety.
- The revivals of the Great Awakening split congregations in the 1730s and 1740s, half a century after Dongan wrote.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 10
Read the source
Collective petition · staged reading of cited transcription · Verbatim excerpt · cited transcription
Here is liberty of conscience wch is right and reasonable; here ought to be likewise liberty of the body, except of evildoers There is a saying that we shall doe to all men licke as we will be done ourselves; macking no difference of what generation, descent or Colour they are.
— Francis Daniel Pastorius, Gerret Hendericks, Derick op den Graeff and Abraham op den Graeff, The Germantown petition demands liberty of the body (April 18, 1688)
There is a saying that we shall doe to all men licke as we will be done ourselves; macking no difference of what generation, descent or Colour they are. … Here is liberty of conscience wch is right and reasonable; here ought to be likewise liberty of the body, except of evildoers
— Petition against slavery signed by four Quakers of Germantown, Pennsylvania, 18 April 1688
The belief behind the petitioners’ argument also led Quakers to
- admit to membership only people who had a conversion experience
- allow women to speak and to preach in their religious meetings
- pay tithes to support an ordained and university-trained clergy
- baptize infants into a church that the colony’s law supported
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) allow women to speak and to preach in their religious meetings
- Requiring a conversion experience for church membership was a Puritan practice in New England that Quakers rejected.
- Quakers believed an inner light lived in each person, so they had no ordained ministers and let women speak and preach in meeting.
- Quakers refused to pay tithes and had no paid clergy, one reason English authorities fined and jailed them.
- Quakers rejected outward sacraments such as infant baptism and opposed churches that the law made residents support.
Skill: Explain a historical concept or development
Sugar Island
Barbados and New England · 1637–1680
Question 11
Read the source
Private letter · staged reading of separate excerpts · Verbatim excerpts · 1947 printed letter
wee might easily haue men woemen and Children enough to exchange for Moores for I doe not see how wee can thrive vntill wee gett into a stock of slaves suffitient to doe all our buisines our servants will still desire freedome to plant for them selves
— Emanuel Downing, Emanuel Downing urges a stock of enslaved workers (About August 1645)
Downing’s concern about servants most directly reflected which condition in the English colonies?
- Rocky soil and short summers kept New England’s farms small.
- Virginia’s headrights drew most English servants to tobacco fields.
- Cheap land let servants who finished their terms start their own farms.
- The Pequot War left Native captives whom colonists sold abroad.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Cheap land let servants who finished their terms start their own farms.
- New England’s poor soil did limit farm size, but Downing worried that servants would leave to farm, not that farming paid poorly.
- Headrights pulled many servants to the Chesapeake, yet Downing’s point concerned servants in New England quitting to work their own land.
- Land was plentiful and labor scarce, so servants who finished their terms could farm for themselves, which led Downing to want workers held for life.
- Colonists did sell Pequot captives in the West Indies after the war of 1637, but that trade explains his exchange plan rather than his worry about servants.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
Question 12
Read the source
Book · Verbatim
The slaves and their posterity, being subject to their Masters for ever, are kept and preserv'd with greater care then the servants, who are theirs but for five yeers
— Richard Ligon, Ligon compares permanent enslavement with fixed service (1657)
The distinction in the excerpt helps explain which development on Barbados after the 1640s?
- Planters freed enslaved workers who were baptized as Christians.
- Former servants bought land as the great estates broke apart.
- Planters turned from sugar to food crops to feed the island.
- Planters bought enslaved Africans in larger numbers as sugar spread.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Planters bought enslaved Africans in larger numbers as sugar spread.
- Barbados planters resisted baptizing the people they enslaved because they feared it would weaken their claim, and baptism did not bring freedom.
- Sugar estates swallowed small farms, so many former servants found no land on Barbados and left for other colonies.
- Planters put nearly all their land into sugar and bought their food, including flour and fish from the mainland colonies.
- Once planters turned to sugar in the 1640s, they bought enslaved Africans held for life with their children, and by 1680 enslaved people outnumbered whites nearly two to one.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 13
Read the source
Historical population study / compilation · Adapted
Editorial summary: the displayed 1680 reconstruction follows Dunn’s counts as cross-checked by Handler and Reilly: 38,782 enslaved people, approximately 21,000 white residents, with the 2,317 white men-servants already part of the white total.
— Richard S. Dunn, Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624–1713; The Barbados Census of 1680: Profile of the Richest Colony in English America (1972)
Barbados, 1680. Enslaved people: 38,782. White residents: about 21,000, including 2,317 white male servants.
— Richard S. Dunn, “The Barbados Census of 1680” (1969) and Sugar and Slaves (1972), figures cross-checked by Jerome S. Handler and Matthew C. Reilly (2017)
The island economy reflected in the data most directly encouraged which development in the mainland colonies?
- Northern colonists shipping food, flour and timber to the sugar islands
- Chesapeake planters replacing tobacco with sugarcane on river estates
- New England towns refusing to trade with colonies that held slaves
- Quaker meetings ordering their members to free the people they held
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Northern colonists shipping food, flour and timber to the sugar islands
- Sugar planters used nearly all their land for cane, so merchants from New England and the middle colonies sold them food, flour, fish and barrel timber.
- Sugarcane needed a frost-free climate, so Chesapeake planters kept growing tobacco.
- New England merchants traded heavily with the sugar islands, and some carried enslaved people there themselves.
- Quaker meetings set aside the Germantown protest in 1688 and did not require members to free enslaved people until the 1770s.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 14
Read the source
Reported speech; performance is a dramatization · Dramatization
If you Roast me to day, you cannot Roast me to morrow
— Anonymous pamphleteer reporting Tony, Tony’s answer in a hostile account of the 1675 plot (1676, reporting events of 1675)
The source is best used as evidence of which of the following?
- Servants and frontier farmers rising against a colonial governor
- Native nations fighting settlers who pushed onto their lands
- Quaker colonists protesting slavery on grounds of conscience
- Enslaved Africans resisting bondage where they were the majority
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Enslaved Africans resisting bondage where they were the majority
- Bacon’s Rebellion in Virginia in 1676 set frontier farmers, servants and others against Governor Berkeley, a different conflict from a plot by enslaved Africans on Barbados.
- Native nations fought New England settlers in King Philip’s War in 1675, but the Barbados plot was planned by enslaved Africans.
- Quaker protests against slavery, such as the Germantown petition of 1688, came from free colonists rather than from enslaved people.
- Enslaved Africans far outnumbered whites on Barbados, and the 1675 plot shows them organizing to resist slavery despite brutal punishment.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
A Colony of a Colony
The Carolinas · 1670–1750
Question 15
Read the source
Colonial report through a scholarly table · Adapted
Summary: the report counted 4,080 white people, including servants; 4,100 enslaved Black people; and 1,400 enslaved Native people. Together, the two enslaved categories outnumbered the white population.
— Governor Nathaniel Johnson and council; tabulated by Peter H. Wood, Carolina's population report, 1708 (September 17, 1708)
Carolina, 1708. White people, including servants: 4,080. Enslaved Black people: 4,100. Enslaved Native people: 1,400.
— Report of Governor Nathaniel Johnson and his council, 17 September 1708, as tabulated by Peter H. Wood, Black Majority (1974)
The population pattern in the data resulted most directly from
- a long growing season and wetlands suited to rice grown for export
- the Crown’s direct rule over the colony’s government from its founding
- Scots-Irish and German farmers settling in the colony’s backcountry
- the colony’s appeal to French Protestants and other religious refugees
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) a long growing season and wetlands suited to rice grown for export
- Rice planters needed many workers for the swamps and fields, so they bought enslaved Africans, and traders also sold Native captives, until enslaved people outnumbered whites.
- Carolina began in 1663 as a proprietary colony owned by eight proprietors, and the Crown took over its government only after 1719.
- Scots-Irish and German farmers reached the southern backcountry in large numbers after the 1730s, and as free settlers they added to the white population.
- French Protestants and other refugees did settle in Carolina, but they came as free migrants and do not explain an enslaved majority.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 16
Read the source
Proposed constitutional scheme · Verbatim
Religion ought to alter nothing in any Man's Civil Estate or Right … no Slave shall hereby be exempted from that Civil Dominion
— The Lords Proprietors of Carolina, Worship without emancipation: article 107 (1670 printing)
Despite the limit stated in the excerpt, enslaved people in the Lowcountry kept some control over their lives mainly by
- winning freedom in colonial courts after they joined Christian churches
- using the time left after daily tasks for gardens, family and worship
- electing members of the Commons House to argue for their rights
- buying their freedom with wages paid for their work at the indigo vats
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (B) using the time left after daily tasks for gardens, family and worship
- Carolina’s laws kept baptized people enslaved, so joining a church did not open a path to freedom in court.
- Under the task system, workers who finished an assigned job could use the rest of the day for themselves, which helped sustain Gullah culture inside slavery.
- Free men with property elected the Commons House, which wealthy planters controlled, and enslaved people had no vote.
- Enslaved workers at the indigo vats were not paid wages, and the planters who owned them kept the profits of the crop.
Skill: Explain how a development fits a broader context
Question 17
Read the passage
Surely there is no place in the World where the Inhabitants live with less Labour than in N Carolina. It approaches nearer to the Description of Lubberland than any other, by the great felicity of the Climate, the easiness of raising Provisions, and the Slothfulness of the People.
— William Byrd II, Virginia planter, The History of the Dividing Line betwixt Virginia and North Carolina, on the 1728 boundary survey (first printed 1841)
The conditions Byrd described are best explained by which feature of North Carolina?
- Few good harbors, which kept most farms small and limited exports
- Proprietors who banned slavery and limited the size of landholdings
- A boom in indigo that drew the colony’s planters away from tobacco
- Spanish raids that kept settlers from clearing land near the coast
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (A) Few good harbors, which kept most farms small and limited exports
- With few deep harbors, North Carolina shipped little directly overseas, so most settlers kept small tobacco and food farms and large plantations were rare.
- North Carolina’s proprietors allowed slavery, and a ban on it was the policy of Georgia’s trustees after 1735.
- Indigo became a major crop in the 1740s, after Byrd’s survey, and it spread mainly in South Carolina’s Lowcountry.
- Spanish raids threatened the colonies farther south near Florida rather than North Carolina’s farms on the Virginia border.
Skill: Explain how a source fits a broader historical context
The Last Colony
Georgia · 1732–1751
Question 18
Read the source
Collective petition · dramatized reading · Dramatization
It is shocking to human Nature, that any Race of Mankind and their Posterity should be sentanc'd to perpetual Slavery; … We are not rich, … that instead of introducing Slaves, you'll put us in the Way to get some of our Countrymen,
— Signers of the Petition of the Inhabitants of New Inverness, Darien's counter-petition (3 January 1739)
Which development most directly undercut the position taken in the petition by 1751?
- Oglethorpe’s plan for Georgia as a buffer guarding South Carolina from Spain
- Spanish Florida’s promise of freedom to people who fled the English colonies
- Settlers’ demands for enslaved labor to grow rice as South Carolina did
- The trustees’ grants of fifty-acre farms to poor settlers from Britain
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Settlers’ demands for enslaved labor to grow rice as South Carolina did
- The buffer plan supported the ban, since the trustees feared that enslaved people near the border would aid Spain or flee to it.
- Florida’s offer of freedom was one of the Highlanders’ own arguments against slavery, not a reason to allow it.
- Savannah settlers who watched Carolina rice planters grow rich kept demanding enslaved labor and smuggling it in, and the trustees made slavery legal in 1751.
- Small fifty-acre grants were part of the trustees’ plan for a colony of free farmers, which the ban on slavery was meant to protect.
Skill: Explain a causal relationship
Question 19
Read the source
Fundamental Orders · modernized transcription · Verbatim
shall be chosen by all that are admitted Inhabitants in the several Towns and have taken the oath of fidelity the Governor be always a member of some approved Congregation
— Connecticut General Court, Connecticut's different rules for voters and governor (January 14, 1638/9)
[Deputies] shall be chosen by all that are admitted Inhabitants in the several Towns and have taken the oath of fidelity … the Governor be always a member of some approved Congregation
— Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, 14 January 1638/9, orders 7 and 4 (spelling modernized)
Which feature of Georgia before 1751 most clearly contrasts with the way leaders were chosen in the excerpt?
- Its trustees passed laws in 1735 that banned both slavery and rum.
- Its founders planned it as a military buffer for South Carolina.
- Its trustees gave small land grants to poor settlers from Britain.
- Its trustees ruled from London and allowed no elected assembly.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (D) Its trustees ruled from London and allowed no elected assembly.
- The 1735 bans governed what settlers could own and sell, not how their leaders were chosen.
- Georgia’s role as a military buffer explains why Britain founded it in 1732, not how its leaders were chosen.
- Small land grants shaped who settled Georgia but did not decide who made its laws.
- Connecticut’s settlers elected deputies to make laws, while Georgia’s trustees governed from London and gave settlers no elected assembly until 1751, and even then it could only advise.
Skill: Compare related historical developments
Question 20
Read the source
Collective petition · dramatized reading · Dramatization
The Want of the Use of Negroes, with proper Limitations;
— Signers of the Representation of Freeholders in Georgia, Savannah freeholders demand enslaved labor (December 9, 1738)
Georgia’s labor policy from 1735 to 1751 best supports which claim about the southern colonies?
- Officials in London pressed slavery on settlers who wished to work their own land.
- Small farms prospered under the ban and drew settlers away from South Carolina.
- Settlers’ demands and policy choices decided when slavery spread into a suited climate.
- Georgia’s founders copied South Carolina’s plantation model from the colony’s first years.
Answer and reasoning
Answer: (C) Settlers’ demands and policy choices decided when slavery spread into a suited climate.
- Georgia’s trustees in London banned slavery, and settlers themselves petitioned to bring enslaved people in.
- Georgia grew slowly under the ban, and many settlers left for South Carolina, where enslaved labor was legal.
- Georgia shared Carolina’s climate from the start, but slavery became legal only in 1751, after settlers had demanded it and smuggled enslaved people in.
- Georgia began with small free farms and a ban on slavery, and planters copied Carolina’s rice plantations only after 1751.
Skill: Explain how causes interact